{"id":"W2161910496","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2009.07.022","title":"The Observer-Rated Scale for Mania (ORSM): development, psychometric properties and utility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Affective Disorders","topic":"Bipolar Disorder and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Mania; Psychology; Construct validity; Discriminant validity; Rating scale; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Reliability (semiconductor); Scale (ratio); Test validity; Psychiatry; Confirmatory factor analysis; Bipolar disorder; Developmental psychology; Mood; Statistics; Structural equation modeling; Internal consistency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119267,0.0006766716,0.0009633743,0.001821279,0.0005082466,0.001170272,0.0009051891,0.0008382146,0.001779458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03362457,0.0004504343,0.001792327,0.001046133,0.0006303557,0.001273359,0.001402018,0.001242421,0.0007593771],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005674476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009048894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001510715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003302341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922813,0.002985962,0.001247728,0.0005371408,0.002773415,0.0001744656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782251,0.008800176,0.004679581,0.001461247,0.006266087,0.0005678142],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001996536,0.0008297242,0.8228487,0.000514717,0.001102822,0.0001487527,0.001547041,0.001590102,0.003710723,0.001210463,0.003683918,0.1608166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003413225,0.002336762,0.9795035,0.0002002865,0.0003097444,0.0008889799,0.0007331781,0.006364141,0.001806318,0.001257789,0.006123692,0.000134327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9351895,0.003520742,0.03556362,0.0004903431,0.0005058537,0.003485315,0.002974587,0.0003597561,0.01791032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9465593,0.001926315,0.04167315,0.0003253194,0.0002127744,0.00219468,0.00389311,0.0001557748,0.003059483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06307524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03001734999278045,"score_gpt":0.2752097942738118,"score_spread":0.2451924442810313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}