{"id":"W2161913772","doi":"10.1002/hyp.10477","title":"Investigations of uncertainty in SWAT hydrologic simulations: a case study of a Canadian Shield catchment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Streamflow; Environmental science; SWAT model; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Snowmelt; Uncertainty analysis; Hydrology (agriculture); Snow; Drainage basin; Catchment hydrology; Geology; Geography; Mathematics; Statistics; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002403334,0.0004679702,0.0003589223,0.000964782,0.001272212,0.001162377,0.0009701955,0.0006287495,0.0004735989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00734078,0.0002856789,0.0005210385,0.001506515,0.00107571,0.0006185191,0.0005482017,0.0004956505,0.0000332097],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01142733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004472486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.855682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8206381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992322,0.0002093455,0.00004282685,0.0001044767,0.0002961682,0.0001150294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949333,0.003296768,0.0003716388,0.0002515001,0.0009607336,0.0001861428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002494447,0.0001358658,0.1395822,0.00005040817,0.0001374509,0.0005408696,0.000665498,0.8462344,0.00257699,0.00130742,0.000511534,0.008007852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004332186,0.0000804873,0.08532549,0.00001642361,0.00005462386,0.00005854694,0.0006179294,0.9105008,0.002004923,0.000553455,0.0006921761,0.0000518344],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986518,0.00002226318,0.0005456309,0.00006472645,0.000001041587,0.00001233614,0.0001740872,0.00002515829,0.0005029045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987043,0.00001684804,0.000993995,0.00001041128,0.000001106006,0.000004777541,0.0001713044,0.000006242841,0.00009093156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.144318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2903359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06682343176749736,"score_gpt":0.2761959802433264,"score_spread":0.209372548475829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}