{"id":"W2161913772","doi":"10.1002/hyp.10477","title":"Investigations of uncertainty in SWAT hydrologic simulations: a case study of a Canadian Shield catchment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Streamflow; Environmental science; SWAT model; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Snowmelt; Uncertainty analysis; Hydrology (agriculture); Snow; Drainage basin; Catchment hydrology; Geology; Geography; Mathematics; Statistics; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000374474,0.0001403532,0.0002734873,0.0002437649,0.00009855216,0.000005026697,0.0002019126,0.00009487521,0.0001618377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005203753,0.0001061318,0.00002052282,0.001143501,0.0004167535,0.0001235799,0.0001821704,0.0001270707,0.0000178497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008175571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004827607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2319033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5524527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987051,0.0001269782,0.0003866723,0.0003051998,0.0001961454,0.0002798412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993556,0.0001538987,0.000119345,0.0001884544,0.00002617092,0.0001564912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002525306,0.0004883002,0.4776263,0.00001952113,0.00001801603,0.0002842501,0.006178303,0.5151138,0.00002120538,0.00002997201,0.0001596319,0.00003552521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02702548,0.03612787,0.1949033,0.000276205,0.001346657,0.001023244,0.1539452,0.3431468,0.002690077,0.2207278,0.01396473,0.004822692],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995075,0.00005934333,0.000008397594,0.000948279,0.00002408975,0.0005261975,0.000006351142,0.0000201813,0.003332181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994327,0.00001175629,0.00008729074,0.0003437629,0.000006325627,0.00006919583,0.000005224422,0.000004201939,0.0000394958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3205494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7732115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06682343176749736,"score_gpt":0.2761959802433264,"score_spread":0.209372548475829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}