{"id":"W2161944241","doi":"10.1109/iembs.2011.6091482","title":"A novel approach to automated cell counting for studying human corneal epithelial cells","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Image Processing Techniques and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Thresholding; Computer science; Segmentation; Artificial intelligence; Cluster analysis; Image segmentation; Computer vision; Lens (geology); Pattern recognition (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Sample (material); Cell counting; Cell; Image (mathematics); Biology; Chemistry; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004640571,0.0005669119,0.000758794,0.00161532,0.0005074714,0.000860443,0.001590201,0.0009479287,0.001207688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001114601,0.0005390669,0.0005266457,0.001117499,0.0005016183,0.0006062106,0.0006360654,0.0008832382,0.0007288397],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005868871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009522992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001511757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003355816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987642,0.0001025912,0.00004000426,0.000162945,0.0008907492,0.00003960846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989901,0.0002880867,0.00009395137,0.0001813018,0.0004048739,0.00004162861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005717205,0.00007112016,0.0008608268,0.000236341,0.00003893434,0.0001226829,0.0001281278,0.004884608,0.8086502,0.002489723,0.0009756567,0.1814846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002258735,0.0002627424,0.004993946,0.0000254861,0.00005417453,0.001714854,0.00006608951,0.2625202,0.7112761,0.002021393,0.016937,0.0001054843],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01561228,0.0003136133,0.9812727,0.00007499378,0.00005000472,0.0001029554,0.0001122522,0.001536322,0.000924781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04597084,0.0002630629,0.9521968,0.00004784075,0.00002254167,0.0002114782,0.0001457145,0.00006573412,0.001075971],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00161532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004258156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04975686118725336,"score_gpt":0.2610023762623948,"score_spread":0.2112455150751414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}