{"id":"W2162004515","doi":"10.1155/2010/517532","title":"Improvement of Open Source Software Usability: An Empirical Evaluation from Developers' Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Software Engineering","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Computer science; Empirical research; USable; Perspective (graphical); Software; Open source software; Key (lock); Usability engineering; Usability goals; World Wide Web; Web usability; Knowledge management; Software engineering; Human–computer interaction; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001125466,0.0002664721,0.0003566486,0.00023786,0.00009812315,0.000206953,0.002204015,0.0001292204,0.00006720565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004136448,0.0002823759,0.00005333251,0.001216837,0.00007969703,0.003723313,0.0009255855,0.0005154575,0.00000884596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003253012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003209046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003680114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004449681,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975729,0.00005479103,0.0005857587,0.0008069575,0.0006069951,0.0003725805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972758,0.000673676,0.0001809672,0.001100044,0.0006546536,0.0001148917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002590469,0.000472995,0.2839909,0.00005472226,0.00005825923,0.000008953151,0.01216532,0.09163054,0.004160372,0.005557329,0.00003698534,0.6018378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006752796,0.001080814,0.4911473,0.0006511439,0.0001155228,0.0000460554,0.004909407,0.3511671,0.03162575,0.06570734,0.04238173,0.004415018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3560625,0.0001580346,0.642338,0.00009048436,0.000533139,0.0005181812,0.00001245903,0.0002501552,0.00003701885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4812488,0.000004917853,0.5184366,0.00007500663,0.00005668603,0.0001286995,0.00001642175,0.00002462663,0.000008302152],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5974227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01975330174503238,"score_gpt":0.338469478058,"score_spread":0.3187161763129677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}