{"id":"W2162163297","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x","title":"Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1548,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Systematic review; Inter-rater reliability; Psychological intervention; Reliability (semiconductor); Medicine; Quality (philosophy); Knowledge translation; Randomized controlled trial; MEDLINE; Applied psychology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Nursing; Computer science; Rating scale","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6496053,0.004546386,0.03509668,0.05049998,0.003867385,0.01524874,0.008159606,0.008263982,0.008943469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.845983,0.005424962,0.05878695,0.04607013,0.01126014,0.01411914,0.0184717,0.007897624,0.0008964558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02559689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02957145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007379543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00894068,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1324502,0.5243726,0.256295,0.01746106,0.06780307,0.001617946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1076461,0.7062775,0.1128386,0.02748686,0.0434062,0.00234478],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005261938,0.0001047848,0.01255078,0.7178664,0.1538484,0.0001617973,0.004686507,0.0012479,0.0004284199,0.005586521,0.006007783,0.09224878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02675632,0.003032803,0.04482148,0.5672912,0.263108,0.001373205,0.00364316,0.0102849,0.002211157,0.03753418,0.03809501,0.0018486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02088938,0.7099627,0.1283913,0.01064697,0.005171051,0.1065504,0.01211496,0.001431684,0.004841707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2150351,0.08910665,0.2936164,0.003768544,0.00120603,0.3913266,0.00446065,0.000698476,0.0007815066],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3503947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4320991,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9715762644417735,"score_gpt":0.8799747184237315,"score_spread":0.09160154601804193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}