{"id":"W2162163297","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x","title":"Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1548,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of Calgary; University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Systematic review; Inter-rater reliability; Psychological intervention; Reliability (semiconductor); Medicine; Quality (philosophy); Knowledge translation; Randomized controlled trial; MEDLINE; Applied psychology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Nursing; Computer science; Rating scale","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9715762644417735,"score_gpt":0.8799747184237315,"score_spread":0.09160154601804193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}