{"id":"W2162163884","doi":"10.1136/jech.55.7.508","title":"A heuristic approach to the formulas for population attributable fraction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Confounding; Fraction (chemistry); Attributable risk; Medicine; Heuristic; Population; Representation (politics); Limit (mathematics); USable; Econometrics; Statistics; Public health; Distribution (mathematics); Estimation; Environmental health; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01472217,0.001868814,0.001284956,0.005285968,0.001033217,0.00365482,0.003657368,0.002265318,0.01171525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07911607,0.0008467226,0.001852844,0.004482408,0.00405439,0.006414939,0.003101367,0.005228224,0.003473888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002706726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002398453,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002494287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002086011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898545,0.006137764,0.0005822554,0.0008004172,0.002359806,0.0002654037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753945,0.01956187,0.001019375,0.001926927,0.001967993,0.0001293936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002186692,0.00002148414,0.0004255655,0.0001506201,0.00003116122,0.000146425,0.0002334949,0.01462244,0.0001747805,0.9212099,0.008649228,0.05431314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002401789,0.00002925123,0.0001880479,0.0001481961,0.00003420764,0.0003476392,0.00007068007,0.06796742,0.0004013471,0.9081026,0.02265309,0.00003362842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005234293,0.0004488854,0.9942755,0.0009204717,0.0001412751,0.00005853299,0.00009050528,0.0001709207,0.00337043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03744952,0.001092968,0.9560311,0.0009052032,0.0004556846,0.0006041339,0.0001793741,0.0002446391,0.003037384],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01472217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07785922,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5047912795363017,"score_gpt":0.5411379398954912,"score_spread":0.03634666035918954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}