{"id":"W2162188008","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11238","title":"A copula‐based risk aggregation model","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Financial Services Commission; Institute of Engineering Research, Seoul National University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Copula (linguistics); Bivariate analysis; Econometrics; Conditional independence; Cluster analysis; Statistics; Independence (probability theory); Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003470829,0.0008918734,0.00161264,0.00157886,0.0008757786,0.003802111,0.00214182,0.001650199,0.006397713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006632474,0.0005730813,0.001368759,0.002135823,0.001190498,0.002345988,0.001614613,0.002211255,0.0009511567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002735308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001736613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02142659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01124888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981705,0.0007357994,0.00007809127,0.0003870448,0.0003690871,0.0002594769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968683,0.001538868,0.0004612321,0.000299641,0.0006209037,0.0002110124],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003400394,0.00006371599,0.001589877,0.00004771907,0.0001117249,0.0002834831,0.0002279348,0.559092,0.0004243771,0.4220904,0.00501108,0.01102371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007011693,0.00001320548,0.0003892904,0.00001184235,0.00001774262,0.00004114655,0.00002251969,0.9351547,0.0000379391,0.06321125,0.001080274,0.000013047],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0641646,0.0008099559,0.9096299,0.001801249,0.000127393,0.0001275608,0.0008425671,0.0003988623,0.02209791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217377,0.0007249322,0.0587379,0.0002409685,0.0001487319,0.0002525083,0.0006769595,0.0001312697,0.01734904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02142659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04260373,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08423950940045458,"score_gpt":0.2256144069670408,"score_spread":0.1413748975665862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}