{"id":"W2162242360","doi":"10.1080/02844310600940679","title":"Replacement of proximal interphalangeal joints with new ceramic arthroplasty: A prospective series of 20 proximal interphalangeal joint replacements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery","topic":"Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Interphalangeal Joint; Range of motion; Grip strength; Prospective cohort study; Arthroplasty; Rheumatoid arthritis; Finger joint; Prosthesis; Osteoarthritis; Physical therapy; Patient satisfaction; Surgery; Hand strength; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005780366,0.0006938653,0.0006465277,0.0009515778,0.0007704988,0.000758828,0.0003212586,0.0007185284,0.001248497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002536596,0.000644304,0.0006151121,0.0007231344,0.0008271159,0.0004988772,0.0004986493,0.0004630556,0.0005720709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002888561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003549794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009303568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001417419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993382,0.0001118279,0.00008653301,0.0001260814,0.0001981252,0.0001393142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988927,0.0002778263,0.0003137616,0.0001303704,0.0001102979,0.000275113],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004119172,0.0004520245,0.9850228,0.00004188594,0.00008819049,0.005999667,0.0003780384,0.00008916097,0.001729836,0.00001668273,0.0001395414,0.005630256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001187652,0.00526754,0.9391216,0.00002931317,0.0001192821,0.0519008,0.0007279263,0.0002511324,0.001028122,0.00002993551,0.001369822,0.00003567397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991861,0.0004990197,0.0000927872,0.00000946313,0.000005763879,0.00001349798,0.00003269183,0.000003135782,0.0001575994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998928,0.000447551,0.0001267352,0.00004408731,0.00002000347,0.00002296283,0.0001900117,0.00000272921,0.0002178881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001248497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004176676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0119729371253297,"score_gpt":0.2215772341649636,"score_spread":0.2096042970396339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}