{"id":"W2162384648","doi":"10.1177/0021998309102038","title":"A New Evaluation Method for Surface Finish of Composite Automotive Panels Using Waveform Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University; University of Calgary","keywords":"Profilometer; Materials science; Composite number; Surface (topology); Waveform; Molding (decorative); Quality (philosophy); Automotive industry; Surface finish; Composite material; Sheet moulding compound; Amplitude; Acoustics; Computer science; Optics; Mathematics; Engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001777612,0.0001894387,0.0008547416,0.000193062,0.00004698324,0.00008897152,0.0001780675,0.0000916775,0.00009495817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005250509,0.000162736,0.0002637106,0.0003491968,0.00000962738,0.0002461922,0.00001355759,0.00007553498,0.000001218048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001534879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005425079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002196322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.348994e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980054,0.000152788,0.0009594406,0.0001149925,0.0005435,0.0002238388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984223,0.0001436327,0.0004641726,0.0001558542,0.0006951624,0.0001188357],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246869,0.00003144548,0.0001045705,0.00002924449,0.0005837553,0.000001351525,0.0001716939,0.3681098,0.6273564,0.00001480181,0.00001468888,0.003457626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187724,0.0002110863,0.01325327,0.000151186,0.002032461,0.00001073446,0.00002718724,0.1728681,0.8093554,0.000693478,0.0000347768,0.0001746666],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6911423,0.0002236362,0.3078887,0.00004826506,0.000388463,0.0002064436,0.00002735485,0.00001594053,0.00005882994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7935603,0.0000167197,0.2062774,0.0000217146,0.00009621429,6.111435e-7,0.000007274078,0.000015255,0.000004550431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1952417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.663618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04895367987695753,"score_gpt":0.3336246909235932,"score_spread":0.2846710110466357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}