{"id":"W2162387657","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.50.4.491","title":"Progressive Reforms or Maintaining the Status Quo? An Empirical Evaluation of the Judicial Consideration of Aboriginal Status in Sentencing Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Sentencing guidelines; Criminology; Judicial opinion; Population; Psychology; Status quo; Criminal justice; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Demography; Sociology; Sentence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02505356,0.0001288627,0.0002111599,0.002031632,0.002945089,0.002972838,0.00100883,0.0007545736,0.001946649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1316007,0.0002024604,0.0002907839,0.002144295,0.006789299,0.002233324,0.001991041,0.001478596,0.0001664408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006781175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008771805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06983504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1394123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9801074,0.01081931,0.0009925606,0.001090705,0.005239394,0.001750699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9108787,0.03587621,0.03815581,0.003225313,0.008933394,0.002930549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004213904,0.0003719746,0.806772,0.0002628968,0.000146574,0.0005919883,0.09320245,0.0007014655,0.0007048324,0.023885,0.0008567754,0.0720826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003074441,0.0004492681,0.9456023,0.0002780761,0.00007013701,0.0001439317,0.04503008,0.000905021,0.0003153703,0.002653058,0.004495611,0.00002644953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914096,0.0003325669,0.00016194,0.001314415,0.00001460241,0.0000485257,0.00002043638,0.000001163664,0.006696732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993999,0.0001566961,0.0001019611,0.00005613239,0.00001472916,0.000009497053,0.000007341008,9.549872e-7,0.000252753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1388571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.191980077784868,"score_gpt":0.4136724080165791,"score_spread":0.2216923302317111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}