{"id":"W2162387657","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.50.4.491","title":"Progressive Reforms or Maintaining the Status Quo? An Empirical Evaluation of the Judicial Consideration of Aboriginal Status in Sentencing Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Sentencing guidelines; Criminology; Judicial opinion; Population; Psychology; Status quo; Criminal justice; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Demography; Sociology; Sentence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004046575,0.0002591359,0.0005663207,0.0007284341,0.001268678,0.00006424933,0.0005798077,0.0003603423,0.0001166218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01715002,0.0001854177,0.000171309,0.0004901406,0.00223365,0.0004078191,0.00004144872,0.00100864,7.45399e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001807192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02406669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.176736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7860962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948766,0.00196678,0.001001253,0.0003288795,0.0004071507,0.001419324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937249,0.002270404,0.0008992777,0.000367263,0.001810391,0.0009277452],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001213665,0.0003051877,0.05323178,0.0005449692,0.0002817296,0.002769022,0.799077,0.0133757,0.0005079684,0.03994009,0.0003651652,0.08838771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007141036,0.000553846,0.1137134,0.0003102848,0.00864396,0.002763163,0.8686475,0.001907053,0.0001174829,0.001918644,0.0004877736,0.0002227881],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950865,0.001155329,0.0006460732,0.001414701,0.0005374525,0.0003029667,0.00002684892,0.000008069239,0.0008220523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965382,0.001441936,0.001176096,0.0005050664,0.000270357,0.00002119689,0.000005632334,0.00001850292,0.0000230376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6093602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.191980077784868,"score_gpt":0.4136724080165791,"score_spread":0.2216923302317111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}