{"id":"W2162460951","doi":"10.1525/auk.2009.126.4.2","title":"Does a lack of design and repeatability compromise scientific criticism? A response to Smith et al. (2009)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Auk","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"University of Colorado Denver","keywords":"Compromise; Repeatability; Criticism; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003712324,0.00008166082,0.0001543302,0.00003621694,0.0001475212,0.00003454096,0.0003080695,0.00002279431,0.000447537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005060187,0.00004423711,0.00003184206,0.0002769236,0.0005557922,0.00008546076,0.0001693712,0.00007508053,0.0001241302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005050222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000160289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005854538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005424214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984733,0.0006135828,0.0001905783,0.0003226303,0.000195682,0.0002041573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988297,0.0003943492,0.00004941156,0.0006487745,0.00001393928,0.00006386815],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004774936,0.001230488,0.06929176,0.00002171776,0.00006310629,0.00005015324,0.01431624,0.01198141,0.7650282,0.0005079203,0.1181498,0.01458426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004964032,0.0005610968,0.9326813,0.00001685732,0.00004083754,0.00001101695,0.0002443855,0.00302317,0.02978283,0.009125947,0.02379223,0.0002239102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794328,0.0000147346,0.001637469,0.01804375,0.00004804421,0.0003314504,0.000005179844,0.00001623554,0.0004703786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873618,0.000003829103,0.005623855,0.004910311,0.000003218443,0.000009797061,4.099113e-7,0.000004152973,0.002082609],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8633896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4900216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02912212682131077,"score_gpt":0.3014923605655563,"score_spread":0.2723702337442456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}