{"id":"W2162470768","doi":"10.1139/x08-164","title":"A bioeconomic approach to assess the impact of an alien invasive insect on timber supply and harvesting: a case study with Sirex noctilio in eastern Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Invasive species; Range (aeronautics); Alien; Ecology; Biology; Agroforestry; Geography; Forestry; Engineering; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001122639,0.000122878,0.0001810331,0.0004039099,0.0001519795,0.0001258339,0.000420927,0.00002602396,0.0000976494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001131768,0.00007740508,0.00002568482,0.0005222027,0.0001898737,0.0002423037,0.00003979901,0.0003362911,0.000006585346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007394877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001393106,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985467,0.0002318758,0.0002380846,0.0001831322,0.0003292459,0.0004709418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998768,0.0001260554,0.00008685936,0.0002509214,0.00003711069,0.0007310405],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009754531,0.00008831251,0.9698189,0.000003715324,0.00002077681,0.002218808,0.002398737,0.02230928,0.000007740658,0.00002324106,0.001786093,0.001226879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005474567,0.003427444,0.9922377,0.00002887629,0.000006005742,0.0006086582,0.001930648,0.0009184909,0.000008164542,0.00003237013,0.0001572988,0.00009682307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922059,0.000007395394,6.241047e-7,0.0002690902,0.00001055094,0.0005156825,0.000009702148,7.836796e-7,0.00698034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994619,8.505604e-7,0.00004663499,0.00008442142,0.00003079416,0.000006000452,0.000001186249,0.000009730949,0.0003584918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02241889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3156487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08884270313222047,"score_gpt":0.3322714568418298,"score_spread":0.2434287537096094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}