{"id":"W2162470768","doi":"10.1139/x08-164","title":"A bioeconomic approach to assess the impact of an alien invasive insect on timber supply and harvesting: a case study with Sirex noctilio in eastern Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Invasive species; Range (aeronautics); Alien; Ecology; Biology; Agroforestry; Geography; Forestry; Engineering; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000572659,0.000880644,0.0005297745,0.0008437737,0.001728297,0.001959229,0.00179779,0.001280352,0.002701889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001166617,0.000421171,0.0007022963,0.0009009418,0.001108826,0.0007181143,0.0008222782,0.0009401794,0.0000949722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02488986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01212309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9320199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9377762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997585,0.00006322788,0.000007646426,0.00002645642,0.00003352139,0.0001106281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994821,0.0002423772,0.00004551906,0.00001775482,0.0001113867,0.0001008267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047615,0.0001227369,0.01952389,0.000041528,0.00006308851,0.0005429183,0.0001565695,0.9704728,0.0006817018,0.005148419,0.0006019865,0.002539627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007517148,0.0001028535,0.01102503,0.00001925746,0.00008479563,0.00006846766,0.001220771,0.9840915,0.0003125521,0.00140098,0.001560496,0.0000381101],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791679,0.0002899698,0.003586928,0.0006094446,0.00001284947,0.0001377431,0.0007761083,0.00003740717,0.01538167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934389,0.0002664036,0.002606707,0.00004718845,0.000004266645,0.0000373999,0.0002087948,0.000007585291,0.003382724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06798011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1805894,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08884270313222047,"score_gpt":0.3322714568418298,"score_spread":0.2434287537096094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}