{"id":"W2162490337","doi":"10.1021/ac048295c","title":"Characterizing Dissolved Organic Carbon Using Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation with On-Line UV and DOC Detection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytical Chemistry","topic":"Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Field flow fractionation; Dissolved organic carbon; Fractionation; Flow (mathematics); Carbon fibers; Flow injection analysis; Line (geometry); Environmental chemistry; Chromatography; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Detection limit; Mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008705681,0.0001829536,0.0001734442,0.000098647,0.00007151503,0.00005368402,0.00006368196,0.0002341826,0.0002001689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001752979,0.0001809011,0.00003950432,0.0003364549,0.0000231411,0.0001988658,0.00001769837,0.00044816,0.000005635949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002562079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001661642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001003033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006047971,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990513,0.000009357503,0.0002341634,0.0002499351,0.0002599851,0.0001952469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994333,0.0001653699,0.00004552739,0.0001725087,0.00007912275,0.0001041292],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001979586,0.0002486792,0.001364909,0.0002531615,0.0002674418,0.00002542795,0.00009571943,0.03177109,0.8699498,0.00004824995,0.0002599565,0.09551758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001568947,0.00003216974,0.0003829127,0.00002259647,0.00002880997,0.00002324885,0.00000947915,0.6006113,0.3980244,0.00001885042,0.0005448272,0.0001445669],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8793741,0.00004715364,0.1137156,0.0007489029,0.00009453477,0.0001195639,0.000004782735,0.0005725211,0.005322877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995118,0.00003660014,0.004086867,0.0001414533,0.000448502,0.00001005286,0.0000188692,0.00003355428,0.0001061117],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5688402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7376931,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01159342794599567,"score_gpt":0.2377620922529436,"score_spread":0.2261686643069479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}