{"id":"W2162593703","doi":"10.1109/tsg.2014.2374592","title":"Electric Vehicle Charging Stations With Renewable Power Generators: A Game Theoretical Analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid","topic":"Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure","field":"Engineering","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning","keywords":"Revenue; Nash equilibrium; Competition (biology); Game theory; Electricity; Renewable energy; Electric vehicle; Microeconomics; Computer science; Electricity generation; Economics; Power (physics); Engineering; Electrical engineering; Physics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001292549,0.001220728,0.001130089,0.0008309211,0.0009201838,0.002190339,0.001907543,0.001929454,0.007394868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004413693,0.0007132782,0.001191687,0.001025976,0.001787657,0.002962299,0.001407874,0.001641195,0.000505968],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002438113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001706657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008233185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005930066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989911,0.0005207834,0.00002143264,0.0001009821,0.0001780461,0.0001876647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982305,0.001284748,0.0001768113,0.00004800893,0.0001653334,0.00009458935],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003865609,0.0000737458,0.0004440673,0.00007528377,0.00003137337,0.0001909474,0.00006642559,0.7550718,0.0006570253,0.238242,0.001207344,0.003901233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001514936,0.00003032918,0.0001104427,0.00001149318,0.00001096974,0.00005757125,0.00005517708,0.966436,0.00008882259,0.03205684,0.001117711,0.000009601077],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09685238,0.001519206,0.8069074,0.002039409,0.0001934618,0.0002874999,0.0002452378,0.00009883369,0.09185663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944523,0.001253406,0.03869638,0.0003406788,0.0001510017,0.0002394571,0.00009139816,0.00005341793,0.01465123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008233185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02473831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002947140121565371,"score_gpt":0.1794791131024789,"score_spread":0.1765319729809136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}