{"id":"W2162793198","doi":"10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00807.x","title":"DNA BARCODING IS A POWERFUL TOOL TO UNCOVER ALGAL DIVERSITY: A CASE STUDY OF THE PHYLLOPHORACEAE (GIGARTINALES, RHODOPHYTA) IN THE CANADIAN FLORA","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Phycology","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; DNA barcoding; Gigartinales; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Range (aeronautics); Genetic diversity; Biodiversity; Species complex; Ulvophyceae; Zoology; Algae; Phylogenetic tree; Chlorophyta; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008495735,0.00009990431,0.0002294374,0.0001827261,0.0002371361,0.0000256912,0.0005113629,0.00008093826,0.001690007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001118374,0.00005571429,0.00007430345,0.0003177808,0.0000667689,0.00008943617,0.0000889396,0.0005223972,0.00001635858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009359937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002818775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3499366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9680506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988729,0.0002286484,0.0003023917,0.0001204298,0.0002112201,0.0002643717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992294,0.0002098012,0.0001947092,0.000172335,0.00008155924,0.0001121993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001521385,0.00008621092,0.9724054,0.000004973323,0.00003586775,0.00364398,0.0049532,0.0001031186,0.0003842012,0.00001645545,0.003048121,0.01516634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007785193,0.00182173,0.955175,0.00000922839,0.00005180205,0.007824766,0.008281833,0.00009747888,0.00007604105,0.000274656,0.02546627,0.0001426657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938464,0.00001762482,7.291166e-7,0.001378857,0.0006713115,0.0002106642,0.00003419821,0.000001176356,0.003839033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979988,0.000002172223,0.00003961398,0.001705638,0.0001523686,2.966365e-7,0.000001026471,0.0000015438,0.00009848984],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6181139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992226,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01686032380894106,"score_gpt":0.2264436235900673,"score_spread":0.2095832997811263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}