{"id":"W2162895624","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2006.09.007","title":"The consequences of surrendering a degree of freedom to the participant in a contingency assessment task","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavioural Processes","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency; Psychology; Task (project management); Outcome (game theory); Contingency management; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Contingency table; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Intervention (counseling)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003023021,0.0001650864,0.0004138231,0.0001580457,0.0002042669,0.0002244509,0.00123833,0.00005504975,0.00003473889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001992454,0.00008262476,0.0001030232,0.0009839984,0.0004113321,0.0002084475,0.0002012599,0.0001503132,0.00001236511],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003393244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003653209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002970542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996882,0.0001442169,0.001420914,0.000362039,0.0008422896,0.0003485653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962027,0.001968831,0.0006531032,0.0005358642,0.0005823217,0.00005715666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007926788,0.0003419634,0.8436113,0.00001964231,0.00001031223,0.00001496325,0.001084398,0.003137338,0.004969009,0.001115734,0.001428117,0.144188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007587788,0.0004059585,0.9385919,0.0003119382,0.0001110743,0.00002800072,0.009180944,0.0006705502,0.0120235,0.03430633,0.003127836,0.0004831698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968038,0.000697222,0.0003175892,0.001059534,0.0002946788,0.0003148262,0.00004450211,0.00001408164,0.000453787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999095,0.00002067476,0.0006703746,0.00001625025,0.00002842584,0.00005702152,0.000001548309,0.000008922568,0.0001017649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1437048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7836266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3159016008127257,"score_gpt":0.4228083189894901,"score_spread":0.1069067181767643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}