{"id":"W2162933417","doi":"10.1177/0886260512468250","title":"The Average Predictive Validity of Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment Instruments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive validity; Risk assessment; Recidivism; Domestic violence; Receiver operating characteristic; Risk management tools; Proxy (statistics); Poison control; Medicine; Injury prevention; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Statistics; Environmental health; Computer security; Internal medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06686172,0.001103564,0.001542489,0.004208824,0.0006094986,0.002327208,0.001388307,0.001144702,0.001002816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2203516,0.0005759117,0.002852746,0.002892554,0.001746563,0.003171118,0.002416698,0.001779847,0.0004946075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000858944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009773076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002029676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9653166,0.01564285,0.003161662,0.003136884,0.01163819,0.001103844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7224295,0.2248659,0.0171321,0.01445584,0.01889227,0.002224467],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003376315,0.00007069222,0.9418519,0.00009108634,0.001079994,0.0000365326,0.0002575588,0.001815915,0.0001980539,0.0003763405,0.0005740406,0.05331016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004223049,0.001017925,0.9708806,0.0002398579,0.0006900747,0.0003260786,0.0004877128,0.02110705,0.001134506,0.002253033,0.001749922,0.00007092438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720989,0.005353373,0.01387026,0.0008980139,0.0003601705,0.000166653,0.0007477272,0.0002705401,0.006234344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941354,0.0007951015,0.003950629,0.0001008345,0.0001043241,0.00005846081,0.0006269625,0.00003170352,0.000196552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06686172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3536028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02700903771795152,"score_gpt":0.3460561367751578,"score_spread":0.3190470990572062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}