{"id":"W2162933417","doi":"10.1177/0886260512468250","title":"The Average Predictive Validity of Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessment Instruments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":182,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive validity; Risk assessment; Recidivism; Domestic violence; Receiver operating characteristic; Risk management tools; Proxy (statistics); Poison control; Medicine; Injury prevention; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Statistics; Environmental health; Computer security; Internal medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004801994,0.0002113217,0.0003663782,0.000154276,0.0006839198,0.00009453901,0.0009232801,0.0001136686,0.000120737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006736522,0.0001412855,0.0002987349,0.0003194569,0.0008567315,0.001001189,0.0001491797,0.0006714667,0.00002618674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002357489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002814925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007348556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962907,0.0008186623,0.0008364136,0.0001722632,0.001231274,0.0006507081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969597,0.0005654327,0.001243879,0.0002255845,0.0007069879,0.0002984106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005737704,0.0006844014,0.8709855,0.0000547012,0.0003283357,0.00001322121,0.01217799,0.000137925,0.0009696761,0.01929228,0.001449868,0.09333232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001195956,0.001263868,0.9420958,0.004615976,0.0002739899,0.00006866822,0.02170111,0.003230675,0.005400434,0.01299957,0.006508019,0.000645922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730381,0.0009196428,0.006161218,0.0001036427,0.002541414,0.000262073,0.00004867537,0.00002023967,0.01690497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837161,0.01470177,0.0009316317,0.000110154,0.0004833467,0.000009624705,7.566611e-7,0.00001258442,0.00003397252],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0926864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5761457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02700903771795152,"score_gpt":0.3460561367751578,"score_spread":0.3190470990572062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}