{"id":"W2162936945","doi":"10.5558/tfc79865-5","title":"Knowing a socially sustainable forest when you see one: Implications for results-based forestry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Stewardship (theology); Business; Forestry; Community forestry; Sustainable forest management; Ecoforestry; Social sustainability; Environmental resource management; Forest management; Certification; Process (computing); Environmental planning; Political science; Intact forest landscape; Forest ecology; Geography; Computer science; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008089301,0.0002527303,0.0001919083,0.0000464288,0.0009865955,0.0001390967,0.0007417386,0.000124668,0.0007435858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002897804,0.0002107146,0.0001881474,0.0003618461,0.0003797619,0.0003449533,0.000205478,0.0001919914,0.0005327343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005219865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002293642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009641346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009295335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978491,0.00007744698,0.0003732131,0.0004468966,0.0002573651,0.0009959539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985749,0.0002127128,0.0001733758,0.0008645409,0.00003046337,0.0001440206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002866175,0.0004932312,0.07037614,0.0001777792,0.0001118639,0.000006184822,0.001127282,0.05024658,0.0004458529,0.4447623,0.428743,0.003223132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003130334,0.0003003418,0.0673396,0.0000238151,0.0001197882,0.000004512071,0.0001928933,0.00561685,0.000486797,0.1680893,0.7541403,0.0005554224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5821984,0.0003560934,0.008409361,0.03123619,0.0003101076,0.005205162,0.0001912826,0.0005403204,0.3715531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539061,0.000009149719,0.002567034,0.000978453,0.0001927015,0.0004253652,0.00007717848,0.00005985699,0.0417842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3717076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8592694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01905967720929439,"score_gpt":0.2643472960572879,"score_spread":0.2452876188479935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}