{"id":"W2162943275","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdq003","title":"Consumption Inequality and Intra-household Allocations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Australian National University; Yale University","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Consumption (sociology); Inequality; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001360498,0.000201321,0.0003548987,0.001523527,0.0004100362,0.001018204,0.0003682088,0.0002959611,0.004757579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006997858,0.0001294249,0.0002803018,0.004073226,0.0008939476,0.001203955,0.001215904,0.0004086891,0.0004175896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009453425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003321499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01034949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00881747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986454,0.0006964453,0.00007439582,0.0002292945,0.0001845203,0.0001699496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979729,0.0008522094,0.0005513276,0.0002986596,0.0002751074,0.00004991736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002416679,0.0001126048,0.677043,0.0003121626,0.0004458216,0.0002711394,0.004468635,0.01279786,0.0007060696,0.1694974,0.003017447,0.1310862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109229,0.00006419572,0.8816119,0.0002367734,0.00007278033,0.0001868044,0.002926854,0.008297812,0.0004554875,0.08376128,0.02235403,0.00002125185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912634,0.005614248,0.02715592,0.001125194,0.00004938126,0.0000684925,0.00204413,0.00003414579,0.07264498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954405,0.0007995716,0.001336853,0.0000584536,0.00001301948,0.00003586648,0.0004207297,0.000006006462,0.00188899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01034949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0205785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2062888121133496,"score_gpt":0.3660701327956535,"score_spread":0.1597813206823039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}