{"id":"W2162943275","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdq003","title":"Consumption Inequality and Intra-household Allocations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Australian National University; Yale University","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Consumption (sociology); Inequality; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001177735,0.00005899039,0.0002229565,0.00001323565,0.0002025406,0.000004713018,0.000123177,0.00001880204,0.00003386877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001409175,0.00004151721,0.00003699939,0.00003400585,0.0004875067,0.00005936626,0.00004626314,0.0000375711,0.00001805596],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004303215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004430273,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000488647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009676407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993801,0.0001441632,0.0002471773,0.00009388915,0.00003844694,0.00009623175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994907,0.0001527336,0.0001386276,0.0001543924,0.00004031753,0.00002326651],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006516692,0.00006840874,0.2159704,0.003883095,0.0004847865,3.092077e-7,0.09098721,0.000003495818,0.000006856291,0.6710752,0.005743638,0.01177008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005758418,0.000101229,0.7919374,0.003791726,0.0007873203,0.000003230624,0.08726551,0.00004651031,0.00002186871,0.06769358,0.04711191,0.0006638865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.6226992,0.3630373,0.000038177,0.001514611,0.0003850249,0.0004570312,0.00001752361,0.00003164008,0.01181953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4436494,0.555854,0.00008142492,0.0003134364,0.00003169404,0.00001246142,5.342026e-7,0.000002396544,0.00005460374],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6033816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1796239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2062888121133496,"score_gpt":0.3660701327956535,"score_spread":0.1597813206823039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}