{"id":"W2163062456","doi":"10.5539/ijb.v5n4p44","title":"The Tragedy of Unpersuasive Power: The Convention on Biological Diversity as Exemplary","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Biology","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Tragedy (event); Delegation; Diversity (politics); Convention on Biological Diversity; Rhetoric; Power (physics); Law and economics; Convention; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Biology; Commons; Philosophy; Social science; Linguistics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004726092,0.00006531345,0.0001033982,0.00001665153,0.0001844095,0.00003167078,0.000923056,0.00008081014,0.0009644456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003413146,0.00001648182,0.0001286982,0.00006543714,0.0003191245,0.00004027353,0.000256536,0.0002112511,0.00007223037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002617762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001388825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001626315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001771597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989788,0.0002565321,0.0002513308,0.00009240094,0.0002820255,0.0001389072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983224,0.0008969638,0.0002032797,0.00003853946,0.0004889859,0.00004987667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005633567,0.0002760607,0.02399247,6.88732e-7,0.0002938546,0.00002157423,0.0002546316,0.000007997477,0.7847993,0.02373662,0.002505108,0.1635483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004862129,0.004291141,0.9168527,0.00001668843,0.000008728858,0.0001592793,0.001653771,0.00001422799,0.02423171,0.03127474,0.02089699,0.000113772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817109,0.0001201523,0.00001343286,0.01651266,0.0003927097,0.0001003479,0.00001005273,0.000003123512,0.001136586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990628,0.0003002091,0.00001559196,0.0004033971,0.000142871,0.000001811798,0.00000372161,3.86892e-7,0.00006922282],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8928603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03448092306633594,"score_gpt":0.2793734573961867,"score_spread":0.2448925343298508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}