{"id":"W2163124719","doi":"10.1006/jcis.2002.8299","title":"A New Method of Evaluating the Average Electro-osmotic Velocity in Microchannels","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colloid and Interface Science","topic":"Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Electrolyte; Mechanics; Capillary action; Electro-osmosis; Flow (mathematics); Flow velocity; Chemistry; Materials science; Current (fluid); Osmotic pressure; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Thermodynamics; Chromatography; Electrophoresis; Composite material; Electrode; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010922,0.0007647288,0.0008290531,0.002311644,0.0005741483,0.001071638,0.001256051,0.0009127342,0.0009440064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00172837,0.0005071055,0.0003302106,0.0009838617,0.0006215202,0.002087314,0.0007036495,0.0008968427,0.0003220731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008310937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006423726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00116065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001582594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990488,0.0001224838,0.00005010393,0.0001780559,0.0005439247,0.00005660727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985904,0.0004189325,0.0001369702,0.000141767,0.0006308853,0.00008098337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002692446,0.0001254588,0.001988731,0.0003088427,0.00007560667,0.00007451774,0.000134357,0.005951831,0.8065748,0.008862377,0.001228673,0.1744057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004198406,0.0002623153,0.002872697,0.00002389115,0.00008156461,0.000459069,0.00004675912,0.2683153,0.7162807,0.002191756,0.009246453,0.0001776072],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05191003,0.001661358,0.9417421,0.0001108685,0.0003392705,0.0001131771,0.0002176095,0.001693028,0.002212666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2894437,0.000965469,0.7040721,0.00009236045,0.0001212485,0.000219824,0.0001522069,0.0002273487,0.004705751],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002311644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006030083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01665366549708081,"score_gpt":0.2903663590813865,"score_spread":0.2737126935843057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}