{"id":"W2163409318","doi":"10.6310/jog.2006.1(1).2","title":"Liquefaction potential index: A critical assessment using probability concept","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of geoengineering","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Penetration test; Geotechnical engineering; Cone penetration test; Soil liquefaction; Index (typography); Foundation (evidence); Environmental science; Engineering; Geology; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006401161,0.00139291,0.001147207,0.009488249,0.0006647735,0.003229097,0.001691853,0.001293446,0.002343222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0244383,0.0004007965,0.0008511471,0.003067186,0.002478349,0.005867341,0.002033893,0.001329442,0.0002910447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001997264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001896423,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002209155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001048118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963632,0.001019949,0.0002623755,0.0003297502,0.001886206,0.0001385691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874381,0.007629144,0.001149818,0.0005436526,0.00299236,0.0002468773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003774719,0.0002180604,0.02562516,0.00138611,0.0002292819,0.0008935506,0.001072214,0.306174,0.0125986,0.1926124,0.005585174,0.453228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003889309,0.0008803016,0.01678349,0.0003547254,0.0001474747,0.001218991,0.0007893581,0.7923386,0.0123868,0.1554322,0.0193686,0.000260554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0502485,0.003604744,0.9319502,0.0006869044,0.0001234073,0.0005626935,0.0004226692,0.000286048,0.01211474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7285142,0.003699719,0.2641071,0.0001570526,0.0003297654,0.0006039395,0.0005091868,0.0000886514,0.001990452],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009488249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03385299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007699948510251594,"score_gpt":0.2353582606869945,"score_spread":0.2276583121767429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}