{"id":"W2163409318","doi":"10.6310/jog.2006.1(1).2","title":"Liquefaction potential index: A critical assessment using probability concept","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of geoengineering","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Penetration test; Geotechnical engineering; Cone penetration test; Soil liquefaction; Index (typography); Foundation (evidence); Environmental science; Engineering; Geology; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003128021,0.0001996861,0.0003141652,0.000176478,0.00004331477,0.00005465658,0.0001448133,0.0001602506,0.0000193311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007431923,0.0002015009,0.000167027,0.0001927445,0.0000225549,0.0002664454,0.00002370895,0.0006399368,0.000001240336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002928156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004311685,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001756651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.903066e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986088,0.00001777819,0.0005941134,0.0001087513,0.0003381951,0.0003323202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994471,0.00005452351,0.00006348704,0.0001528775,0.0001574109,0.0001246185],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004140786,0.00003257645,0.00002065267,0.00008246632,0.00002482518,0.00003823711,0.00001012833,0.9838088,0.01427635,0.0009813865,0.00004720444,0.000673292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003064799,0.00007199719,0.002654098,0.0000940424,0.00004204183,0.0003347273,0.00001490084,0.9924757,0.002187253,0.00121683,0.0003832744,0.0002186557],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4023632,0.0002739567,0.5959335,0.00003629649,0.001075298,0.00005521854,0.000002242136,0.0001771742,0.00008309655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865801,0.0000129397,0.01283379,0.000004579422,0.0005169081,0.000002309464,0.000001103268,0.00004227797,0.00000600306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5842168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8216968,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007699948510251594,"score_gpt":0.2353582606869945,"score_spread":0.2276583121767429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}