{"id":"W2163565119","doi":"10.1111/j.1479-6988.2006.00041.x","title":"Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences: truth, power and fascism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":385,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Institute of Gender and Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Positivism; Power (physics); Epistemology; Obligation; Sociology; Ideology; Episteme; Duty; Normative; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Hierarchy; Inclusion (mineral); Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03123721,0.0002589074,0.0005119634,0.0006548476,0.001446586,0.0001164595,0.001283025,0.000276982,0.0002641545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03572311,0.0001619891,0.0001565616,0.0005975012,0.001185805,0.001513398,0.0001429801,0.004971153,0.00001898334],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001218349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009596281,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005257206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001968523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871001,0.006564638,0.002525641,0.0004468111,0.002611194,0.0007516773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463226,0.04841572,0.002739174,0.0003241852,0.001852268,0.0003460089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001201114,0.0002492775,0.865651,0.001039686,0.00005757935,0.0003064678,0.003428984,0.002730513,0.000111181,0.09620202,0.003207216,0.02581501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01087897,0.003903347,0.4569549,0.2406399,0.0001281118,0.000687301,0.07180463,0.01100385,0.0002588582,0.1903226,0.01190465,0.001512943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.304513,0.01358101,0.003351265,0.6728533,0.004680565,0.0006462076,0.00001629004,0.00002842953,0.0003299322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639189,0.001456446,0.004853706,0.02854976,0.001128932,0.00002710269,0.000001996066,0.00002428207,0.00003882135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6594059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998534,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2976400555689621,"score_gpt":0.5594262736530817,"score_spread":0.2617862180841196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}