{"id":"W2163632303","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914001097","title":"Constitutional Design and Australian Exceptionalism in the Adoption of National Bills of Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney; Australian Government","keywords":"Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Exceptionalism; Statutory law; Legislature; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Public administration; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Parliament","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00300341,0.00004192359,0.0001035639,0.0001492023,0.0004187705,0.00002587431,0.0002463896,0.000032347,0.00004579573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001272841,0.00002869272,0.00003057535,0.000379204,0.01060211,0.0002019719,0.000006715369,0.00008272376,0.000001675116],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001863592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003151495,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05970432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02637401,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985952,0.0001440675,0.0002465603,0.00006866269,0.0006607486,0.0002847988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986638,0.0003492314,0.00009547868,0.00002875956,0.0005441096,0.0003186289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002094107,0.000009248072,0.004496677,0.000001088255,0.000002118957,0.000001637221,0.0005524505,0.00004960032,0.00006391174,0.9946231,0.0001073463,0.00009078321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001578054,0.00006107158,0.3841493,0.00005811792,0.00000706676,0.00002700274,0.001013506,0.00001974226,0.0000823248,0.6091262,0.005238435,0.00005945245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220281,0.0001445029,0.004438369,0.02046428,0.0005362405,0.0002283006,0.00004418616,0.000002617947,0.05211337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.000003084211,0.0005049239,0.0001966057,0.0001495169,7.528074e-7,2.651184e-7,3.875008e-7,0.000007492999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3854969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0538156866212117,"score_gpt":0.3153148536808804,"score_spread":0.2614991670596686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}