{"id":"W2163632303","doi":"10.1017/s0008423914001097","title":"Constitutional Design and Australian Exceptionalism in the Adoption of National Bills of Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney; Australian Government","keywords":"Constitution; Bill of rights; Political science; Exceptionalism; Statutory law; Legislature; Law; Parliamentary sovereignty; Legislation; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Public administration; Human rights; Politics; Sociology; Parliament","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02509506,0.0001162104,0.0004842842,0.00155184,0.01061081,0.007940119,0.001176451,0.002185823,0.003255445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03494276,0.0004069426,0.0003369003,0.001556738,0.02809177,0.003459852,0.006696177,0.004589158,0.0001984247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01802759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01013848,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08302829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1059053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9789326,0.01181403,0.0009251311,0.001999931,0.003512817,0.002815547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801583,0.009099653,0.002102908,0.003597032,0.003614569,0.001427523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001974042,0.00001876275,0.002630957,0.00002756971,0.000007067384,0.0001629714,0.03520891,0.0002203229,0.0003277404,0.9521629,0.000980573,0.008232561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004426468,0.0001445159,0.05396082,0.0004062481,0.00008617295,0.000464112,0.03498683,0.004363673,0.001874961,0.6210198,0.2824794,0.0001691791],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5578938,0.000508116,0.008991136,0.01977745,0.0001622966,0.0001043874,0.0000538827,0.00006981144,0.4124392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934338,0.00006219584,0.001376769,0.0006643948,0.00001090012,0.00002447756,0.000008927015,0.00001077147,0.004407675],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08302829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16509,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0538156866212117,"score_gpt":0.3153148536808804,"score_spread":0.2614991670596686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}