{"id":"W2163655523","doi":"10.1109/pesc.2008.4592679","title":"Comparative evaluation of reactive power compensation methods for a stand-alone wind energy conversion system","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PESC record","topic":"Wind Turbine Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Static VAR compensator; AC power; Control theory (sociology); Compensation (psychology); Capacitor; Induction generator; Wind power; MATLAB; Computer science; Voltage; Power factor; Electric power system; Volt-ampere reactive; Power (physics); Voltage optimisation; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008358268,0.0001613967,0.0004947758,0.0001324779,0.0000638694,0.000008390429,0.00008637018,0.00009328924,0.0000248086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005264942,0.0001588038,0.00009647369,0.0001546548,0.00002835883,0.0001635696,0.00001107778,0.00006983272,0.00000761911],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000442122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006319865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001815419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986292,0.0003287328,0.000402778,0.0001898272,0.0002835716,0.0001659232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986701,0.0003408593,0.0001821223,0.0002033258,0.0005502293,0.00005338604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00319518,0.0005070583,0.006576242,0.002644737,0.003752391,0.00001537865,0.03180946,0.1466103,0.7068418,0.006336764,0.02181378,0.06989691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00349749,0.0002328412,0.005979645,0.0001730759,0.0001722038,0.00002106359,0.001049928,0.9256861,0.05418748,0.00009115596,0.008614221,0.0002947731],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7112311,0.0009822303,0.2746522,0.00001700147,0.001536357,0.001194933,0.00003488005,0.0001858629,0.01016544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933422,0.000008103012,0.006323801,0.000003519304,0.0001030588,0.00008294629,0.00002880525,0.00002480085,0.00008277808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7790758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6475833,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05751750385548229,"score_gpt":0.3162881251668014,"score_spread":0.2587706213113191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}