{"id":"W2163683857","doi":"10.1108/17465640810870373","title":"Competitive advantage as a legitimacy‐creating process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Construct (python library); Competitive advantage; Value (mathematics); Originality; Business; Process (computing); Marketing; Institutional theory; Industrial organization; Public relations; Economics; Sociology; Qualitative research; Management; Political science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01252063,0.0003914366,0.0004093319,0.002796791,0.007747535,0.01277291,0.001166861,0.002326028,0.007243423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0192448,0.0002742436,0.000456118,0.00166187,0.04354002,0.008587832,0.007391198,0.002280916,0.0006321104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005161305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006869537,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00250206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002780874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9860043,0.008699594,0.0003060676,0.001120193,0.002871845,0.0009980041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753308,0.01687382,0.002142676,0.002382215,0.002033406,0.001236986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001838882,0.00003760127,0.001355099,0.0000487072,0.000006137981,0.0002490192,0.03240782,0.0001969305,0.0006444996,0.9538756,0.0004940841,0.0106661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005417234,0.000138932,0.003371387,0.0002718104,0.00002859805,0.0005019647,0.05045019,0.002482666,0.001489343,0.8169187,0.1242312,0.00006109633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2443753,0.0007842733,0.07580842,0.0129622,0.0002058068,0.0003157922,0.00003748124,0.0001330236,0.6653777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901693,0.00009756531,0.005374908,0.0001862488,0.00002945472,0.00005671213,0.00001076892,0.00001942328,0.004055507],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01277291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06621617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1264499434857957,"score_gpt":0.4829268237621164,"score_spread":0.3564768802763207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}