{"id":"W2163777236","doi":"10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/105021","title":"Maximum-likelihood coherent-state quantum process tomography","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Journal of Physics","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Physics; Statistical physics; Quantum tomography; Quantum state; Coherent states; Tensor (intrinsic definition); Quantum; Algorithm; Quantum process; Process (computing); Estimator; A priori and a posteriori; State (computer science); Direct-conversion receiver; Fock space; Quantum mechanics; Homodyne detection; Computer science; Quantum dynamics; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002104435,0.0005938655,0.0009331689,0.0004538149,0.0006247251,0.001055971,0.001551275,0.001300723,0.002362165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006946137,0.0004099497,0.0004688815,0.0008227497,0.001634271,0.002439169,0.001644021,0.001458928,0.0006245346],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009415717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009748385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007218228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009479134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.0004965613,0.00002733961,0.0001191299,0.0002842259,0.00007378402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974726,0.001870348,0.0001810599,0.0002847046,0.0001291177,0.00006209634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003149452,0.000142184,0.001779245,0.0001906413,0.00007555787,0.0002292642,0.0001637656,0.6599042,0.01009964,0.2938802,0.002127041,0.03109329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001881206,0.000009829278,0.00010842,0.00000415857,0.000002467074,0.00002234324,0.000005895759,0.9568071,0.00181008,0.04083754,0.0003596438,0.00001379613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0332649,0.0002026935,0.9602931,0.0004359861,0.00002151736,0.00008250594,0.0001591541,0.000346864,0.005193219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6756487,0.0001736832,0.3214592,0.0001255751,0.00002818392,0.0001672032,0.000306361,0.0001276564,0.001963502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002362165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01112944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.015042601640722,"score_gpt":0.2536873759854851,"score_spread":0.2386447743447631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}