{"id":"W2163896320","doi":"10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.06.001","title":"Probabilistic fatigue analysis of shop and field treated tubular truss bridges","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Constructional Steel Research","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Federal Highway Administration; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Structural engineering; Truss; Welding; Reliability (semiconductor); Probabilistic logic; Truss bridge; Cracking; Engineering; Bridge (graph theory); Fracture (geology); Fatigue cracking; Stress (linguistics); Materials science; Computer science; Geotechnical engineering; Composite material; Mechanical engineering; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006487435,0.0002504304,0.0004690094,0.000742855,0.0002810315,0.0002811505,0.0007766489,0.001112165,0.001712872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001051428,0.0002846561,0.0005786438,0.0003518239,0.0004483051,0.0002912745,0.0001902598,0.0002561121,0.0001273612],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005632677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003080821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004979264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00614978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999843,0.00004396353,0.00000545848,0.00002386013,0.00005848668,0.00002515006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994167,0.0003324362,0.00005855287,0.00003370351,0.0001400937,0.00001855025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001749204,0.00004889879,0.002201295,0.00003670868,0.00002293808,0.00007259106,0.00004299336,0.9770881,0.008406317,0.002123205,0.0002185147,0.009563593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003499857,0.00003835458,0.002631259,0.000001948953,0.000006807094,0.00001775414,0.00001074587,0.9957554,0.001097701,0.0003521761,0.00007940306,0.000004915617],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268557,0.0002804178,0.06927812,0.00007118047,0.00001174498,0.00002481737,0.0001668556,0.0001469047,0.003164315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996601,0.00003993376,0.002093417,0.000003980458,0.000003743386,0.000009662791,0.00007138862,0.00001505631,0.00116168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004979264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00990057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04682705092892047,"score_gpt":0.3343868043893216,"score_spread":0.2875597534604011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}