{"id":"W2163914921","doi":"10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb05298.x","title":"EVALUATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE SWAT MODEL FOR COASTAL WATERSHEDS IN SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA<sup>1</sup>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; Hydrology (agriculture); Surface runoff; SWAT model; Watershed; Routing (electronic design automation); Hydrological modelling; Discharge; Channel (broadcasting); Water quality; Drainage basin; Streamflow; Geology; Geography; Ecology; Climatology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003648306,0.000116246,0.0002752231,0.00003874727,0.0001631284,0.00001289698,0.0005517417,0.00004354879,0.00001334444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001161792,0.0000503007,0.0002536076,0.000208308,0.0003496604,0.00009661645,0.0003381476,0.0001617775,0.000002132339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002770023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001032977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007119825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004804124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975029,0.0006202208,0.0005479424,0.0001374672,0.0009550928,0.0002364416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998462,0.00007826131,0.001094506,0.0002675657,0.00008187057,0.00001578558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006073001,0.00006895811,0.5751439,0.00000599293,0.00004990189,3.333207e-8,0.00486925,0.4177627,0.001440173,0.00000225243,0.0001581573,0.0004379119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001121579,0.00009081006,0.7935703,0.0000328413,0.0003884268,0.000001351256,0.001490581,0.1908037,0.005310725,0.006534248,0.0005383572,0.0001170367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946291,0.000008979672,0.0002827405,0.004201744,0.00005156554,0.000452767,0.00001298413,0.000002476242,0.000357646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993471,0.000002131457,0.00005434587,0.000148997,0.00004161849,0.00001388415,8.137437e-7,0.000008519381,0.0003825815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.226959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2051203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01068238411986284,"score_gpt":0.2271932337929725,"score_spread":0.2165108496731097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}