{"id":"W2163917379","doi":"10.1073/pnas.0810076106","title":"Historical forest baselines reveal potential for continued carbon sequestration","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"U.S. Forest Service; Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Northern Research Station; Wisconsin Historical Society; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Clearing; Carbon sequestration; Reforestation; Logging; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Land use; Greenhouse gas; Agricultural land; Agriculture; Ecosystem; Land use, land-use change and forestry; Secondary forest; Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Carbon dioxide; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009468893,0.000222333,0.0001881051,0.0009810835,0.000459363,0.00088581,0.0002720835,0.0002900873,0.00214947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001794462,0.0001389707,0.0001799822,0.00185628,0.0002319023,0.001218622,0.000432689,0.0002729737,0.0003567308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008055768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003304664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02163208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07725819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999686,0.00005957698,0.00002674036,0.0001213097,0.00004347897,0.00006289529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990498,0.0001102648,0.0002790477,0.0001795073,0.0002973954,0.00008391175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000196589,0.00004333449,0.9277063,0.0001249669,0.0002869782,0.0001910017,0.0006159394,0.004499969,0.005102464,0.0028625,0.003814393,0.05455542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003939965,0.00004572425,0.9754591,0.00005920645,0.00006376574,0.0001152791,0.0004858968,0.002879995,0.0007696176,0.001442638,0.01865655,0.0000181939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766126,0.00167622,0.002420028,0.0003190015,0.0000255931,0.00001099566,0.01204028,0.0001176919,0.006777612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921663,0.0003071426,0.001377982,0.0000474272,0.00001007304,0.000008552366,0.005713351,0.00001565075,0.0003535997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02163208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04301232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02745322318294245,"score_gpt":0.2810303802317907,"score_spread":0.2535771570488483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}