{"id":"W2163948174","doi":"10.1002/cjs.5550330405","title":"A nonparametric test for interaction in two-way layouts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Test statistic; Nonparametric statistics; Estimator; Ranking (information retrieval); Statistics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Rank (graph theory); Statistic; Null hypothesis; Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Null (SQL); Limiting; Covariance; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01075992,0.0007862864,0.002215639,0.00282518,0.00122994,0.001894715,0.002248878,0.001717375,0.005036728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06496621,0.0005225022,0.001868452,0.002558269,0.002981631,0.002503203,0.002435647,0.002563485,0.000767939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009001537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001842276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006754713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9819674,0.008358339,0.000806182,0.002762156,0.005399205,0.0007066524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9268739,0.05826383,0.003965565,0.005872966,0.00413132,0.000892497],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003542902,0.001820493,0.1002854,0.0009692349,0.002265905,0.001692809,0.001540756,0.05470961,0.09237123,0.08190651,0.008306232,0.6505889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000967286,0.007105276,0.1647619,0.0001788329,0.0007569036,0.002986856,0.001530192,0.542903,0.05337228,0.2038193,0.02083863,0.0007796162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1015947,0.0001620755,0.8932278,0.0002343729,0.0001464594,0.0002534535,0.0007316461,0.001101713,0.002547757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5715225,0.0000696305,0.4232289,0.0002550721,0.0001006471,0.001235042,0.001548804,0.0003360856,0.00170328],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01075992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05690455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05586300490728202,"score_gpt":0.3146718824202835,"score_spread":0.2588088775130015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}