{"id":"W2164112819","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v6n11p43","title":"Reviewing the Ambiguous: Examining the Typologies of Public Participation Towards Its Evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Perspective (graphical); Citizen journalism; Public participation; Sociology; Participatory planning; Dual (grammatical number); Participatory evaluation; Public engagement; Management science; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01522944,0.00006289763,0.0001325869,0.0001200852,0.0007370041,0.0002750217,0.0004392698,0.00004416901,0.0004099467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009098746,0.00003378568,0.00003907993,0.0005303475,0.000175299,0.0007909453,0.00007282457,0.0001678329,0.000008720866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003365356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004415554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003122361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003955152,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970452,0.0008918427,0.0005312986,0.00006707471,0.001090593,0.000373945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964227,0.0002406943,0.0004858737,0.0001035088,0.002658362,0.00008884829],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851186,0.0002026829,0.00380847,0.0001735956,0.0002079521,0.00001250778,0.1185325,0.0001516992,0.0002880442,0.09200153,0.01002016,0.7745823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003842919,0.0001352225,0.3786766,0.00009474339,0.00003878784,0.000006142604,0.3814327,0.00029673,0.001364176,0.004124522,0.2332953,0.0001508503],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9394011,0.001196458,0.0002339791,0.04241767,0.0001275512,0.0007164539,2.107787e-7,0.000008416985,0.01589818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997118,0.0002854542,0.0001741399,0.0001967398,0.0001119816,0.00007624961,6.362069e-7,0.000003337065,0.002033457],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7744315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2749150275827246,"score_gpt":0.4377894458631556,"score_spread":0.162874418280431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}