{"id":"W2164112819","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v6n11p43","title":"Reviewing the Ambiguous: Examining the Typologies of Public Participation Towards Its Evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sustainable Development","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Perspective (graphical); Citizen journalism; Public participation; Sociology; Participatory planning; Dual (grammatical number); Participatory evaluation; Public engagement; Management science; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09561519,0.001085171,0.00130464,0.01831042,0.01384437,0.03218709,0.003810452,0.00598857,0.003782747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1924809,0.0009477973,0.001238124,0.01418832,0.05019164,0.02699277,0.02098322,0.005543641,0.0006936005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01158703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003763787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003633369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7932733,0.1662256,0.007294599,0.003741554,0.02538628,0.004078653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8046117,0.1481227,0.009719223,0.01312718,0.0220658,0.002353353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005566074,0.000041968,0.004128623,0.0006423924,0.00002371642,0.0005044878,0.3766608,0.0004874959,0.0003107096,0.561624,0.002546352,0.05297386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002293086,0.0000852884,0.003532688,0.003574012,0.00004888667,0.000714682,0.5280026,0.002262491,0.0009219022,0.308603,0.1521377,0.00009389583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.2220847,0.00892116,0.1560312,0.05560902,0.001021317,0.001390468,0.0001957364,0.0002194935,0.5545269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591634,0.002791991,0.02580364,0.002101217,0.0002310015,0.001211271,0.0001081393,0.0002010248,0.00838846],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09561519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5056675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2749150275827246,"score_gpt":0.4377894458631556,"score_spread":0.162874418280431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}