{"id":"W2164224838","doi":"10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1193","title":"The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tree Physiology","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":493,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Nutrient; Environmental science; Nutrient cycle; Cycling; Plant litter; Litter; Tree canopy; Forest floor; Soil nutrients; Agronomy; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Ecology; Soil water; Soil science; Forestry; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002659279,0.0001638083,0.00022842,0.0002463381,0.0003634194,0.0005425122,0.0002173421,0.0002677813,0.001226028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009571671,0.0001555935,0.0002536265,0.0001900152,0.0002226432,0.0003550234,0.000449163,0.0001995114,0.0001823195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004849935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003740416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01589114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01531441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997836,0.00006262347,0.00001105277,0.00004777947,0.0000389891,0.00005599341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993232,0.0003211182,0.0001130084,0.00004414452,0.0000860275,0.0001124731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014711,0.0002346167,0.5241601,0.0006022985,0.0004722287,0.001269047,0.0004196886,0.007672138,0.3297765,0.001989834,0.00205562,0.1298769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001059791,0.0000898252,0.9911571,0.00003108658,0.00006724973,0.0002227555,0.00008021735,0.003487856,0.003138187,0.0003091208,0.001393636,0.00001240666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847438,0.006559757,0.0008755651,0.0001854583,0.00003813667,0.000009799455,0.0002460323,0.00003317596,0.007308254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983975,0.0008096438,0.0002475444,0.00006290379,0.00001538955,0.000002302666,0.00008759952,0.00001462899,0.0003624945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01589114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03159726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01538448649533578,"score_gpt":0.2043813323858137,"score_spread":0.188996845890478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}