{"id":"W2164224838","doi":"10.1093/treephys/22.15-16.1193","title":"The influence of the forest canopy on nutrient cycling","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tree Physiology","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":493,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Nutrient; Environmental science; Nutrient cycle; Cycling; Plant litter; Litter; Tree canopy; Forest floor; Soil nutrients; Agronomy; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Ecology; Soil water; Soil science; Forestry; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005255118,0.00006799262,0.00008686176,0.000002550506,0.0001760961,0.000005885187,0.0003049337,0.00004223876,0.00001998935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005565322,0.00001593237,0.00007690115,0.0001474483,0.0001512021,0.00001297294,0.00005611998,0.00008736127,0.00001914063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001017746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001842148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002009082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002039395,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994528,0.00006383654,0.0001133974,0.0001160661,0.0000889181,0.0001649257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994684,0.0003190869,0.00007261944,0.00008794022,0.00002819732,0.00002369478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007657106,0.0001384908,0.03273005,0.000003291322,0.000021451,6.843999e-7,0.0001036648,0.001451919,0.9396551,0.01027742,0.0004529693,0.01508845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007848784,0.0001571579,0.9885707,0.000006642079,0.000004381018,0.000001102913,0.00004064264,0.00170569,0.004519176,0.003458496,0.001401579,0.00005593638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978752,0.00006761638,2.713039e-8,0.001079101,0.00008821801,0.00008015885,0.000004617595,0.00001324522,0.0007917724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993597,0.00006620331,0.000001495718,0.0003631239,0.0000707219,0.00000882707,0.000001506456,4.475428e-7,0.0001279292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1354407,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01538448649533578,"score_gpt":0.2043813323858137,"score_spread":0.188996845890478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}