{"id":"W2164307646","doi":"10.1109/icsm.2006.5","title":"A Feedback Based Quality Assessment to Support Open Source Software Evolution: the GRASS Case Study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings/Proceedings - Conference on Software Maintenance","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Software evolution; Computer science; Documentation; Software engineering; Software quality; Software; Source code; Software development; Open source software; Software analytics; Software peer review; Software release life cycle; Dashboard; Software construction; World Wide Web; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004939147,0.001302427,0.001269494,0.0006617145,0.002497015,0.00658326,0.008231426,0.0003266652,0.0001263721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002121867,0.001061799,0.0003044821,0.005104172,0.0004391473,0.003155063,0.003492451,0.001466775,0.0002910521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001300409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001273554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002494097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003772528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902073,0.00008870412,0.002048869,0.003182933,0.002405586,0.00206664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900403,0.0004703872,0.001409185,0.001375133,0.006102179,0.0006028232],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002554338,0.003282667,0.4652173,0.0002970425,0.0001789893,0.0003784962,0.005416628,0.000264716,0.0004487822,0.4219604,0.08106229,0.02123732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02528938,0.01835109,0.5747279,0.003661494,0.0007147625,0.007613303,0.1058061,0.02657165,0.002366988,0.1100571,0.1069969,0.01784328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2983304,0.00001095371,0.6768064,0.007332276,0.0006192742,0.006101016,0.00006695653,0.002603801,0.008128962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8567595,9.227545e-7,0.1354776,0.003170843,0.0002532171,0.001954445,0.00001371941,0.0001374167,0.002232315],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5584292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999727,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0617437851675178,"score_gpt":0.3361365487881937,"score_spread":0.2743927636206759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}