{"id":"W2164354524","doi":"10.1139/f09-084","title":"Drawing the lines: resolving fishery management units with simple fisheries data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northwest Fisheries Science Center; National Marine Fisheries Service; Office of Science; California Department of Fish and Game","keywords":"Fisheries management; Stock assessment; Cluster analysis; Abundance (ecology); Computer science; Sample (material); Consistency (knowledge bases); Population; Index (typography); Management by objectives; Fishery; Data mining; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Business; Fishing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01124587,0.001051214,0.001440298,0.004240675,0.002202997,0.004446638,0.002552087,0.002056851,0.001339521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06873451,0.001102486,0.001069739,0.004096504,0.002174421,0.009140006,0.005063209,0.002853155,0.0005160716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00213525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002272602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02280478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02994028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921531,0.004399349,0.0006994365,0.001331895,0.001208987,0.0002071808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780787,0.01165817,0.003481362,0.004394647,0.001910337,0.000476839],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005503941,0.0003885413,0.1942545,0.0005324651,0.0006220405,0.0003899061,0.005337104,0.1351616,0.004931611,0.05181568,0.006853388,0.5991627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001817753,0.0003459821,0.101442,0.0005397537,0.0001924709,0.0004084136,0.003976169,0.5488713,0.005329208,0.3176974,0.02057163,0.0004437704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3119815,0.0007634926,0.6777217,0.002775161,0.0001418124,0.0006133966,0.001013515,0.0004791138,0.004510386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3791645,0.0002509335,0.6181772,0.0004490731,0.00006248379,0.0003733253,0.0007292354,0.0001158316,0.0006774365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02280478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05947453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04658832721174532,"score_gpt":0.2493955395200528,"score_spread":0.2028072123083074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}