{"id":"W2164396244","doi":"10.17269/cjph.106.5161","title":"Population health promotion 2.0: An eco-social approach to public health in the Anthropocene","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","topic":"Climate Change and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Population health; Health promotion; Population; Social determinants of health; Anthropocene; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental health; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01605328,0.0001778172,0.0004622765,0.0005173329,0.0007460031,0.000236327,0.0005118793,0.0000889229,0.0001583963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004432781,0.0001430701,0.00004933759,0.001265427,0.00009641522,0.001008138,0.00002359811,0.0004608414,0.00003208102],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007553671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007480752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1655996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3741617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947796,0.001596152,0.0009910044,0.0002725067,0.0006176581,0.001743084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913892,0.0000298439,0.0007182522,0.0002504418,0.00007610958,0.007536155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001238783,0.0009304129,0.2677164,0.0001411475,0.000007888874,0.00001355921,0.1106415,0.0005505686,4.505153e-7,0.001576738,0.1829939,0.435415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007563552,0.002534813,0.8738422,0.00004648112,0.000001284634,0.0001601969,0.0109475,0.0006366479,6.686532e-8,0.0006391006,0.1102298,0.0002056071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3905987,0.0003088235,0.001470479,0.6052666,0.0003805157,0.0008880523,0.00005307871,0.00001401123,0.001019661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573101,0.00006721761,0.0009796069,0.04101293,0.0004776706,0.000009671338,0.0001068155,0.00002412023,0.00001187036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6061258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3217698615206815,"score_gpt":0.3897835335874513,"score_spread":0.06801367206676973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}