{"id":"W2164407869","doi":"10.1139/x04-075","title":"A multi-objective scenario evaluation model for sustainable forest management using criteria and indicators","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Environmental resource management; Sustainable forest management; Context (archaeology); Watershed; Stewardship (theology); Sustainable management; Sustainable development; Unit (ring theory); Business; Computer science; Sustainability; Environmental science; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002520943,0.001397919,0.0009936639,0.001555261,0.0008162002,0.002318019,0.002338115,0.00199188,0.005691401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002534019,0.0007358466,0.001295011,0.001980959,0.0008636495,0.001725732,0.001144471,0.001643985,0.0004238413],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005085173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004253157,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03355353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03106255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998909,0.0005749343,0.00004384019,0.0001349776,0.0001783324,0.0001588334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998906,0.0006404765,0.0001334522,0.00002960938,0.0001985758,0.0000917725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001235273,0.000009920163,0.0001524326,0.00001812129,0.00001188637,0.00002966872,0.00001661511,0.9931502,0.00008667837,0.005283816,0.0001163596,0.001111933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001025624,0.00002211958,0.00008942196,0.000005328349,0.000007949421,0.000008221122,0.00001926105,0.9968116,0.00005885637,0.002546937,0.0004135827,0.0000064203],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07684143,0.0003687453,0.8944367,0.001066796,0.00006742855,0.0006278065,0.001857879,0.000393477,0.02433968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.798948,0.000535821,0.186314,0.0001280098,0.00003076526,0.002198641,0.0009514063,0.00007197868,0.01082137],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9664465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06671649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0741088563481591,"score_gpt":0.3701315518254423,"score_spread":0.2960226954772832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}