{"id":"W2164407869","doi":"10.1139/x04-075","title":"A multi-objective scenario evaluation model for sustainable forest management using criteria and indicators","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Environmental resource management; Sustainable forest management; Context (archaeology); Watershed; Stewardship (theology); Sustainable management; Sustainable development; Unit (ring theory); Business; Computer science; Sustainability; Environmental science; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002776537,0.0001229974,0.0001424196,0.0009571672,0.0005877693,0.0002022705,0.0003390789,0.0000674082,0.0001961828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002302753,0.0001152156,0.00006006041,0.0006073306,0.000404059,0.0006373774,0.0001110243,0.0002306145,0.00001960599],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001966963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02627489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1447884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980844,0.0000802624,0.0002603361,0.0002131987,0.0005733481,0.0007884899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989313,0.000032936,0.0001053022,0.0001735653,0.0001666629,0.000590189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001492486,0.0001077905,0.2988573,0.0001893608,0.0001176546,0.0003117444,0.005412612,0.6659878,0.00005526585,0.01713384,0.007466274,0.004211025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005185949,0.000624623,0.3404639,0.0001866528,0.0001371238,0.00005855189,0.002000269,0.5933647,0.00003481555,0.0484415,0.009067541,0.0004343736],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911159,0.0001170829,0.003096833,0.0003734825,0.00004866291,0.00107236,0.000005255813,0.000003146115,0.004167242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906061,0.00001992507,0.007430836,0.00005392998,0.00006068396,0.00003203421,0.000003923142,0.0000211887,0.001771345],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1185135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0741088563481591,"score_gpt":0.3701315518254423,"score_spread":0.2960226954772832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}