{"id":"W2164433556","doi":"10.1146/annurev-environ-021913-153558","title":"Consumer End-Use Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Environment and Resources","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Carnegie Mellon University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Rebound effect (conservation); Efficient energy use; Environmental economics; Scope (computer science); Consumption (sociology); Ambiguity; Economics; Goods and services; Energy consumption; Welfare; Public economics; Service (business); Business; Computer science; Engineering; Economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002380518,0.000215648,0.0003796545,0.00005557291,0.0001144187,0.00001698778,0.00009509115,0.00007175928,0.0001306058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000534066,0.0001663972,0.00007508977,0.00005058274,0.0005058801,0.0001147302,0.00004587353,0.00006613477,0.00001019258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008142198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002867952,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004569771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003167419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998715,0.0001473382,0.0003567777,0.000304945,0.0002563115,0.0002195682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991324,0.0003014647,0.0001719629,0.0002623783,0.000006511649,0.0001252605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001425195,0.001034157,0.06526735,0.01710642,0.0007235155,0.00003650505,0.008027054,0.001086605,0.00674171,0.2983204,0.003457126,0.5980567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003747704,0.0001625498,0.04152074,0.0008123905,0.000135904,0.000004542893,0.00006565844,0.00002186845,0.0009663656,0.0002666542,0.9554485,0.0002200389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7633197,0.2248311,0.000367754,0.0004365246,0.00007871026,0.0002231689,0.00003121639,0.0000410073,0.01067079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6948255,0.3025266,0.0001258846,0.00106137,0.00004112224,0.00001840374,0.00002329831,0.00001920115,0.001358594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.678548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004978757601255295,"score_gpt":0.2067931005875501,"score_spread":0.2018143429862948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}