{"id":"W2164563129","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyr110","title":"The potential value of sibling controls compared with population controls for association studies of lifestyle-related risk factors: an example from the Breast Cancer Family Registry","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Epidemiology","topic":"Cancer Risks and Factors","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Breast cancer; Medicine; Population; Menarche; Demography; Case-control study; Cancer registry; Logistic regression; Sibling; Family history; Risk factor; Cancer; Environmental health; Internal medicine; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279479,0.000123674,0.0007365334,0.00007145834,0.00008243982,0.000006702603,0.0002455889,0.0001085872,0.00001611071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002785907,0.00006136706,0.0002279847,0.0000553795,0.0001575672,0.0001197252,0.00002039458,0.0002628152,1.132378e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002149146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001215456,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03706898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009185473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977109,0.0004844306,0.001209839,0.0001347218,0.0002983194,0.0001617381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880821,0.00644587,0.003729893,0.0001502629,0.001533674,0.00005826992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004602579,0.00008739175,0.9841773,0.000004646478,0.003710609,0.000001923511,0.0009630831,0.002535982,0.001267955,0.0007547915,0.0005681869,0.001325573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004110803,0.0004019823,0.9856936,0.0001762263,0.0006057922,0.00002290984,0.001616448,0.002321731,0.00007993162,0.004713907,0.0001978172,0.0000588036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912463,0.002053013,0.003369217,0.001678863,0.0009516242,0.0002657545,0.0004176002,0.000005152885,0.00001244377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974343,0.001222432,0.0004906112,0.0002557007,0.0005071936,0.000009377396,0.00005507312,0.00001138609,0.00001399475],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03615044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.109616990128424,"score_gpt":0.3786703727871515,"score_spread":0.2690533826587275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}