{"id":"W2164652777","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00727.x","title":"Landscape scale, heterogeneity, and the viability of Serengeti grazers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Parks Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Herbivore; Foraging; Threatened species; Grassland; Spatial ecology; Spatial heterogeneity; Abundance (ecology); Grazing; Temporal scales; Macroecology; Geography; Resource (disambiguation); Ephemeral key; Biology; Habitat; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004090663,0.00006763656,0.0001202481,0.00001346344,0.0001010963,0.000003848941,0.0001300526,0.00006431078,0.000558567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003209854,0.00004873439,0.00003637086,0.00006178676,0.0008880364,0.00008081764,0.0001074567,0.00009262261,0.00009733271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002864027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003368959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004437549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003210236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993245,0.0001583319,0.0001439237,0.00016666,0.00006057838,0.0001460101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995556,0.0001946565,0.00006448705,0.0001547542,0.000002938142,0.00002757425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003747681,0.00002639431,0.9942859,0.000001812345,0.00001258581,4.594737e-7,0.0001244726,0.0002669471,0.0004818681,0.00003533354,0.004243283,0.0004834989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006384266,0.00002245747,0.9974572,5.766672e-7,0.00001760559,0.00000646672,0.00001584471,0.0004890731,0.0002612074,0.0001430288,0.0008972728,0.00005083552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9558364,0.00001034726,0.00002581329,0.04299052,0.00008093951,0.0001539029,0.000001300196,0.00001254813,0.0008882881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988104,0.000007083381,0.0003029287,0.01150349,0.00002799474,0.00001621012,0.000001756289,0.000003272792,0.00003322032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0322677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6115917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00470309388817973,"score_gpt":0.1949394797149507,"score_spread":0.190236385826771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}