{"id":"W2164652777","doi":"10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00727.x","title":"Landscape scale, heterogeneity, and the viability of Serengeti grazers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology Letters","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia; Parks Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Herbivore; Foraging; Threatened species; Grassland; Spatial ecology; Spatial heterogeneity; Abundance (ecology); Grazing; Temporal scales; Macroecology; Geography; Resource (disambiguation); Ephemeral key; Biology; Habitat; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004580428,0.0001309402,0.0002125361,0.000393042,0.0004435428,0.0009797016,0.0002004422,0.0002785029,0.001674251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001574855,0.0001150677,0.0001645114,0.000227702,0.0006124393,0.0003986155,0.0004019109,0.0002044451,0.00008602223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000611595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001714631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01278271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01953897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998986,0.00003020251,0.000004163221,0.00002337618,0.000005714593,0.00003801757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991335,0.0004003248,0.0002397901,0.00005999532,0.00004569722,0.0001206197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001965072,0.00003244988,0.9870401,0.00001382838,0.00008211342,0.0001969434,0.000189048,0.007591521,0.002223517,0.0003806307,0.0001007078,0.001952645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001388031,0.00006536444,0.9897686,0.000007790278,0.00002519855,0.00008923054,0.0005461013,0.008719088,0.0001643958,0.0004372844,0.0001550589,0.000007974107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997277,0.00002143343,0.00003512333,0.00001204947,5.502102e-7,5.414093e-7,0.00001953601,8.252232e-7,0.0001822407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9999523,0.000005217853,0.000008846265,0.0000013323,6.576402e-7,3.836593e-7,0.00001087227,2.139605e-7,0.00002014118],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01278271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02541655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00470309388817973,"score_gpt":0.1949394797149507,"score_spread":0.190236385826771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}