{"id":"W2164744703","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2014.4.005","title":"An empirical investigation on ranking financial risk factors using AHP method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Technology and Data Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Ranking (information retrieval); Financial risk; Risk analysis (engineering); Empirical research; Business; Computer science; Actuarial science; Engineering; Statistics; Operations research; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008107078,0.0007404252,0.0006498159,0.006098556,0.001390574,0.001769458,0.0007164413,0.000514389,0.003161843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02070305,0.0002361153,0.0009693732,0.005865964,0.0007091374,0.001909514,0.0008766452,0.0009010484,0.0001871632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001795991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003237568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007175828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007285142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9943495,0.002851846,0.0005731954,0.0003787017,0.001510374,0.0003362825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803944,0.0145738,0.00114651,0.0003284193,0.003230867,0.0003261582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008012424,0.001965326,0.2170058,0.003922327,0.0007479219,0.0009321164,0.01433437,0.06075341,0.003303136,0.02779205,0.005921373,0.6625208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002935664,0.001828413,0.1677286,0.001919728,0.0006716618,0.000713997,0.06769761,0.7032693,0.006875764,0.03394281,0.01474804,0.0003105269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7991583,0.001422238,0.1786177,0.001561242,0.0001668471,0.002153873,0.001416439,0.0001882175,0.01531527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8790115,0.0006137819,0.1184506,0.00006289947,0.00003654162,0.0006078566,0.0005139494,0.000007784278,0.00069503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008107078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04287487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03231452226926343,"score_gpt":0.3054929061188429,"score_spread":0.2731783838495795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}