{"id":"W2164771920","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1050.0475","title":"A Note on Feedback Sequential Equilibria in a Lanchester Model with Empirical Application","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Duopoly; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Sequential equilibrium; Computer science; Subgame; Set (abstract data type); Sequential game; Correlated equilibrium; Computation; Solution concept; Mathematical optimization; Best response; Complete information; Equilibrium selection; Game theory; Epsilon-equilibrium; Cournot competition; Repeated game; Mathematics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002377089,0.0001109356,0.0001213676,0.0007098027,0.0001718681,0.0003561827,0.0007405598,0.00002795416,0.00004559346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008166574,0.00007631478,0.00003039493,0.003601741,0.0002545151,0.0004379465,0.0002471004,0.00009188089,0.0003039133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004196859,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001439971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005100013,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968086,0.00002397027,0.0004117171,0.0006572937,0.001772554,0.0003258363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991339,0.00006310472,0.0001506558,0.0004884112,0.0001188132,0.00004508431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004027175,0.0008069229,0.09256817,0.00002526161,0.000006517319,0.00006087392,0.001174223,0.2180329,0.01800779,0.4924736,0.01502133,0.1614197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005699958,0.00003593378,0.06549439,0.00001812155,0.000002573197,0.00000201679,0.00009906117,0.9065868,0.0002686731,0.02302779,0.003740502,0.0001541834],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6594176,9.874917e-7,0.205949,0.001635004,0.00006885186,0.0002887123,0.000001283712,0.00003866878,0.1325999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854385,1.765556e-7,0.01005813,0.001087925,0.0000334137,0.00002813121,0.000002075062,0.000005732533,0.003345923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6885539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3906292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1001671136367473,"score_gpt":0.3842585556178576,"score_spread":0.2840914419811102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}