{"id":"W2164771920","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1050.0475","title":"A Note on Feedback Sequential Equilibria in a Lanchester Model with Empirical Application","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Group for Research in Decision Analysis; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Duopoly; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Sequential equilibrium; Computer science; Subgame; Set (abstract data type); Sequential game; Correlated equilibrium; Computation; Solution concept; Mathematical optimization; Best response; Complete information; Equilibrium selection; Game theory; Epsilon-equilibrium; Cournot competition; Repeated game; Mathematics; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002763434,0.0006123077,0.001277837,0.001046841,0.0008187976,0.001730859,0.001189057,0.001245404,0.009968857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02804982,0.0004028182,0.0008400377,0.001324945,0.001527246,0.00426081,0.001173652,0.00138763,0.0006053766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008431624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007548584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01135506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005807428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988753,0.0005864009,0.00005348786,0.000160892,0.0001661902,0.0001577054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881601,0.00979604,0.000981573,0.0004329119,0.0004318349,0.000197425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004279683,0.0003865647,0.01303248,0.0004669529,0.0001340806,0.001364335,0.001392505,0.4346265,0.003028041,0.5082548,0.003320386,0.03356541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001138333,0.000188731,0.002324833,0.00005414856,0.00003840664,0.0002479725,0.0004597072,0.7440546,0.001000178,0.248404,0.003025009,0.00008865551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6086998,0.001856913,0.3501978,0.001786557,0.00007408181,0.0001471675,0.0002335831,0.0003910355,0.0366132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854445,0.0003842355,0.009728333,0.00008832673,0.00002995046,0.00003679521,0.00007651029,0.00001836023,0.004192992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01135506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0333491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1001671136367473,"score_gpt":0.3842585556178576,"score_spread":0.2840914419811102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}