{"id":"W2164784645","doi":"10.1109/tencon.2004.1415000","title":"Attitude recovery of flexible spacecraft using nonlinear control","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Spacecraft; Feedback linearization; Nonlinear system; Linearization; Control theory (sociology); Attitude control; Fidelity; Computer science; Control engineering; Nonlinear control; Control (management); Class (philosophy); Engineering; Aerospace engineering; Physics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001666083,0.0002302003,0.0001827668,0.0001588433,0.0002136073,0.0003048416,0.0002079798,0.000243209,0.0005870794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006172904,0.00007615975,0.0001486595,0.0001306543,0.0005031444,0.0002946648,0.0005091512,0.0002667598,0.0001112111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002038501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001861805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002399316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009576009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999267,0.00002127736,0.000002423036,0.000009378916,0.00003153961,0.000008730829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998938,0.00003982273,0.00002824006,0.00001386744,0.00001880767,0.000005436967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009089937,0.00002130126,0.0003111825,0.00006584699,0.00001240525,0.0001318963,0.0001108781,0.9101849,0.02735419,0.01271886,0.0004403104,0.04855727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007507513,0.00005120771,0.0001238048,0.00000374507,0.000002380611,0.00002375423,0.00002075587,0.9932074,0.00280574,0.003274872,0.0004738541,0.000004936472],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1871227,0.0004781393,0.8028873,0.000310119,0.00004163362,0.0000288974,0.00001808877,0.0003098349,0.008803294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986453,0.0001719292,0.01146188,0.00001886961,0.00001408197,0.00001747531,0.00001532961,0.00001138111,0.001835975],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002399316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004770696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009191420833891333,"score_gpt":0.2137882260390449,"score_spread":0.2045968052051536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}