{"id":"W2164880146","doi":"10.7557/2.28.1.147","title":"An examination of recovery planning for forest-dwelling woodland caribou (&lt;em&gt;Rangifer tarandus caribou&lt;/em&gt;) in Ontario, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rangifer","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Geography; Woodland; Population; Forestry; Taiga; Christian ministry; Habitat; Ecology; Environmental protection; Biology; Demography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004359667,0.0002715922,0.0003473886,0.0001726238,0.0001973175,0.000036875,0.0003281636,0.0001430539,0.0008944485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004525372,0.0002714664,0.0001051354,0.0003135257,0.00008997124,0.0004520348,0.00007153358,0.0001803823,0.0000235475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007103719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001506191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8020853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979806,0.00006723776,0.0004379769,0.0004301346,0.0005104145,0.0005736517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999199,0.0001271706,0.000142622,0.0003661072,0.00002348331,0.0001416502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004894596,0.0002445012,0.7502001,0.00009694285,0.0001166594,0.0001471076,0.01334635,0.1810268,0.001385871,0.000295279,0.04684582,0.005805091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001766798,0.0002198892,0.9532096,0.00006363351,0.00005501027,0.000009925714,0.0001268079,0.009423912,0.0002278371,0.0001245756,0.03431288,0.0004591106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903476,0.0001152467,0.0003767489,0.00004160968,0.000311033,0.0006015284,0.00006336519,0.00002754199,0.008115306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935789,0.00001630948,0.0005254316,0.0001884351,0.0001032499,0.00006379316,0.0002894988,0.00003765664,0.005196691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2030095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01572473791032173,"score_gpt":0.2164985517696909,"score_spread":0.2007738138593691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}