{"id":"W2165129291","doi":"10.1109/csmr.2012.39","title":"Using fuzzy code search to link code fragments in discussions to source code","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Traceability; Computer science; Source code; Code review; KPI-driven code analysis; Internal documentation; Software engineering; Documentation; Static program analysis; Requirements traceability; Code (set theory); Software maintenance; Fuzzy logic; Software evolution; Software; Software development; Information retrieval; Programming language; Software construction; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009918301,0.0001835012,0.0002015936,0.0004941729,0.0001311994,0.0001734106,0.001724243,0.00008667177,0.00005486127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007737197,0.0001510723,0.00004485612,0.001463937,0.00002237998,0.0004395223,0.002144337,0.0003608259,0.0006583533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002898842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008780948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002572604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001097276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972504,0.0001074542,0.0002618398,0.0004688812,0.0007787172,0.001132746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974886,0.0004602654,0.00001541241,0.001134881,0.00007832138,0.0008225579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005294318,0.0008002171,0.485419,0.0001220769,0.00007112898,0.00006790886,0.0239632,0.3381489,0.03639771,0.01129093,0.01680528,0.08686067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001650788,0.0003601657,0.4333041,0.0005583607,0.00001138349,0.00006343491,0.0006237732,0.4699984,0.02858825,0.0004371783,0.06235941,0.002044802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.291687,0.00002504434,0.7038667,0.00323077,0.000265798,0.0003347064,0.000006985857,0.0002477901,0.0003351918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7837025,0.000001566692,0.2137364,0.0004480219,0.0001489473,0.00003332537,0.000001404895,0.00003053093,0.001897275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4920155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8462018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07597034745385421,"score_gpt":0.3581996075529381,"score_spread":0.2822292600990838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}