{"id":"W2165141300","doi":"10.1139/x05-064","title":"Predicted genetic gains and testing efficiency from two loblolly pine clonal trials","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bioenergy crop production and management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agricultural Research Service; North Carolina State University; International Paper","keywords":"Biology; Loblolly pine; Rust (programming language); Cutting; clone (Java method); Clonal selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Tree breeding; Genetic gain; Pinus <genus>; Progeny testing; Horticulture; Botany; Woody plant; Genetic variation; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002188042,0.00008511126,0.0001932877,0.0001069536,0.0003594304,0.0001681026,0.0002888899,0.00004985278,0.0005179395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001377748,0.0000350859,0.00005711056,0.0005018227,0.0002081597,0.00009412134,0.00003603287,0.0002815507,0.000009758272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008819959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000224465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02179462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2295784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983377,0.0002920838,0.0004057198,0.0001818088,0.0003726738,0.000410044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841,0.0003600793,0.0001272688,0.00005231813,0.0004148544,0.000635412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008407351,0.00007277937,0.2315502,0.000008472317,0.00007842148,0.0001766248,0.0002064588,0.001284217,0.0246862,0.001044122,0.01400845,0.7268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000480223,0.0005096173,0.8453077,0.00004774591,0.00001405029,0.00005913683,0.0001594488,0.000408846,0.0004253636,0.000896835,0.1515859,0.0001050827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904081,0.001451837,0.00001542495,0.006870431,0.0001353417,0.0001331058,0.00003639315,0.000006186834,0.0009432397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966657,0.00008446597,0.0008257012,0.0001318194,0.001908263,0.000002073445,0.000008667,0.000001165195,0.0003721133],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7266949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847193,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1599633701949764,"score_gpt":0.338094277948983,"score_spread":0.1781309077540066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}