{"id":"W2165141300","doi":"10.1139/x05-064","title":"Predicted genetic gains and testing efficiency from two loblolly pine clonal trials","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bioenergy crop production and management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agricultural Research Service; North Carolina State University; International Paper","keywords":"Biology; Loblolly pine; Rust (programming language); Cutting; clone (Java method); Clonal selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Tree breeding; Genetic gain; Pinus <genus>; Progeny testing; Horticulture; Botany; Woody plant; Genetic variation; Genetics; Gene","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006421306,0.0008250067,0.0005868403,0.0005025034,0.0003519046,0.000646038,0.001275431,0.0007165174,0.001128463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009339036,0.0001909244,0.0003560769,0.0003370855,0.0002535537,0.0004492651,0.0004445094,0.0004521975,0.0002978659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009659777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007009021,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002591786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005357271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979038,0.0008628501,0.0001160221,0.0004045289,0.0005711513,0.0001417533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898894,0.006760505,0.0007981031,0.0007429319,0.001277632,0.0005314814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005972946,0.004466221,0.4090862,0.0002204049,0.0004138353,0.0008300823,0.0007104859,0.1650424,0.228094,0.001193225,0.0006847405,0.1832855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000824179,0.02099684,0.481399,0.00007710265,0.0006166149,0.0006685688,0.0002496504,0.3443546,0.1464161,0.001352137,0.002866927,0.0001782783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896685,0.00004278214,0.008546434,0.00001790402,0.000002648154,0.0002580342,0.0002315917,0.0001389753,0.001093114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771697,0.00004943895,0.02030148,0.00002684524,0.000003021222,0.0004233249,0.0009671866,0.00003224318,0.001026689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006421306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03395957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1599633701949764,"score_gpt":0.338094277948983,"score_spread":0.1781309077540066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}