{"id":"W2165160571","doi":"10.1177/0021998312466121","title":"A synergistic damage mechanics approach to mechanical response of composite laminates with ply cracks","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Micromechanics; Materials science; Composite laminates; Stiffness; Composite material; Damage mechanics; Composite number; Finite element method; Structural engineering; Strain energy; Cracking; Bending stiffness; Fracture mechanics; Strain energy density function","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00191739,0.0004344907,0.001185769,0.0004082276,0.00006938463,0.0001240064,0.0007206856,0.0001924559,0.00008715344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009941389,0.0003503357,0.0001660295,0.0003537727,0.0000395928,0.000395411,0.0001656784,0.0003068605,0.00003054534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001303186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003592206,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004383696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.763952e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966365,0.0004456809,0.001371659,0.0001955859,0.0007560884,0.0005944814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976987,0.000454596,0.0004956156,0.0004925627,0.0003319544,0.000526593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002485144,0.0003534982,0.00006875885,0.0001581246,0.0001665805,0.00003312213,0.0002577992,0.00368821,0.9903567,0.002177019,0.0001797325,0.00007526811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009194691,0.0008278337,0.002876943,0.0003751096,0.0003147829,0.0002383352,0.00004850493,0.0008450024,0.9926761,0.0001617546,0.0002922422,0.0004239308],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337704,0.0002178016,0.06456259,0.00005667502,0.0007398466,0.0003317606,0.00005764889,0.00009355844,0.0001696932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539422,0.00001656282,0.04559905,0.00006026791,0.0002332545,0.00001359177,0.000009699938,0.0001022575,0.00002312023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02017177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01406360580562783,"score_gpt":0.2368850084777063,"score_spread":0.2228214026720785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}