{"id":"W2165160571","doi":"10.1177/0021998312466121","title":"A synergistic damage mechanics approach to mechanical response of composite laminates with ply cracks","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Micromechanics; Materials science; Composite laminates; Stiffness; Composite material; Damage mechanics; Composite number; Finite element method; Structural engineering; Strain energy; Cracking; Bending stiffness; Fracture mechanics; Strain energy density function","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003863301,0.0007731057,0.0005926969,0.0008283735,0.0004503544,0.0004377213,0.0007770667,0.0008942586,0.002395554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006911359,0.0002633638,0.0008329251,0.0003585759,0.00058621,0.0005956897,0.0008633326,0.0006726756,0.0003334628],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002487321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007165655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001076318,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998071,0.0000409513,0.00000849429,0.00003460312,0.00008612079,0.00002276455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997796,0.00007273738,0.00005286001,0.00004521503,0.00003945975,0.00001010695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005355796,0.0001010224,0.002236663,0.0000939002,0.00003221113,0.0003223259,0.0001145047,0.9000221,0.05662617,0.01356539,0.0002470781,0.02658508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004274632,0.0001077009,0.000640522,0.00000571188,0.00000656917,0.0001295691,0.00002183017,0.9910449,0.005241081,0.002177765,0.0006119862,0.000008104093],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2508839,0.0003860878,0.7339115,0.0002074265,0.00003472234,0.0001386546,0.00008833905,0.000229958,0.01411938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9165509,0.000353748,0.07624278,0.00004500032,0.0000308948,0.0002363165,0.00004550038,0.00005006794,0.006444682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002395554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008013904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01406360580562783,"score_gpt":0.2368850084777063,"score_spread":0.2228214026720785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}