{"id":"W2165243821","doi":"10.1109/nafips.2004.1336243","title":"Parallel fuzzy cognitive maps as a tool for modeling software development projects","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04.","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy cognitive map; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Process (computing); Realization (probability); Software; Software engineering; Simplicity; Fuzzy logic; Software development; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering; Machine learning; Fuzzy set; Engineering; Programming language; Fuzzy classification","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452148,0.0003492531,0.0003319721,0.0003240953,0.001240842,0.0004628033,0.001291818,0.0001364597,8.092351e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001686618,0.000280944,0.0001531667,0.0011361,0.0001536798,0.005226061,0.0002950405,0.0002496042,0.00004800383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000185424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002280264,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006090404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001369789,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968729,0.00005449862,0.001023576,0.0004193163,0.0009123394,0.000717367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963148,0.0001579,0.0007560811,0.0003372651,0.002320237,0.0001137624],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003607332,0.0004553416,0.0006916162,0.002759019,0.0002104349,0.000006627604,0.2533187,0.2502864,0.0005269421,0.005754992,0.002166164,0.4834631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035476,0.002700668,0.00281467,0.05002156,0.0007332017,0.0008617319,0.102451,0.2054022,0.179581,0.3864407,0.02139846,0.01211889],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0940231,0.0002214794,0.8997927,0.0009330586,0.0006054347,0.001475303,0.00004611992,0.0003300821,0.002572742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8278924,0.000008736388,0.1700574,0.00148785,0.0001292671,0.0002438799,0.00002668039,0.00002051045,0.0001332465],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7338693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999643,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02376407694336632,"score_gpt":0.26349608265084,"score_spread":0.2397320057074737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}