{"id":"W2165253692","doi":"10.1002/jcc.20481","title":"Coupled atomic charge selectivity for optimal ligand‐charge distributions at protein binding sites","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","topic":"Enzyme function and inhibition","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Biotechnology Research Institute; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Selectivity; Partial charge; Charge (physics); Ligand (biochemistry); Chemical physics; Binding energy; Atomic charge; Computational chemistry; Molecular dynamics; Molecule; Charge density; Atomic physics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002031432,0.0001275272,0.0001495242,0.00002875156,0.0001800399,0.00002816528,0.00008029592,0.0001205269,0.00009266787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008765082,0.0001269912,0.0001807863,0.00007977943,0.000040715,0.000013106,0.0000292027,0.0001109871,0.000007091752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001033991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001427851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.589522e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.401531e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991266,0.00001425526,0.0003429344,0.0001615154,0.000187508,0.0001671673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990806,0.0000291857,0.0003333029,0.00006743363,0.0004208148,0.00006865653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000211282,0.0001267817,0.0004661772,0.00003438674,0.00003866373,0.000001557738,0.000004386761,0.002602031,0.9820492,0.00005636657,0.0143959,0.00001328798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001193592,0.0001216976,0.0003117709,0.00002698884,0.00002157492,0.0001271505,0.000005162833,0.002140238,0.9872947,0.0004476967,0.008165682,0.0001437759],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768876,0.0001880039,0.02218367,0.0002157106,0.00006310491,0.0001251348,0.000147438,0.000009581634,0.0001797006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940552,0.000004825727,0.001638026,0.00003472856,0.0008321045,0.00001509754,0.001383715,0.00001485484,0.002021454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02054564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5178549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007915144812363545,"score_gpt":0.2383567858820243,"score_spread":0.2304416410696607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}