{"id":"W2165253692","doi":"10.1002/jcc.20481","title":"Coupled atomic charge selectivity for optimal ligand‐charge distributions at protein binding sites","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","topic":"Enzyme function and inhibition","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Biotechnology Research Institute; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Selectivity; Partial charge; Charge (physics); Ligand (biochemistry); Chemical physics; Binding energy; Atomic charge; Computational chemistry; Molecular dynamics; Molecule; Charge density; Atomic physics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003661254,0.0003039438,0.0003016206,0.0004003692,0.0001989692,0.0004292191,0.0004284763,0.0002766283,0.001229813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008444706,0.0001884793,0.0002139226,0.0003282712,0.0003549891,0.0005514845,0.0003466276,0.0003966582,0.0001916251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006434758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003395845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001134327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001207853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997726,0.00002259183,0.00001009394,0.00005379169,0.0001093824,0.00003145408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997428,0.0001021614,0.00005439162,0.00003135251,0.00005435537,0.00001494666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003817597,0.0001006964,0.00431137,0.0001534185,0.00004015388,0.00007101672,0.00007163585,0.06705762,0.8950581,0.006188998,0.0002388834,0.02632634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004020794,0.0002674576,0.005568512,0.000006411711,0.00003300845,0.00008774445,0.00005022778,0.418406,0.5718982,0.002652935,0.0009639026,0.00002529502],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747197,0.0004836775,0.1212379,0.00007420089,0.00001430476,0.00007115877,0.0001131749,0.0002426757,0.003043168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834062,0.0002211879,0.01581571,0.00003135816,0.000003333082,0.00004648436,0.00006632972,0.00002472036,0.0003847054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001229813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004668772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007915144812363545,"score_gpt":0.2383567858820243,"score_spread":0.2304416410696607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}