{"id":"W2165257846","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v11i25.433","title":"The \"Usability\" of Evaluation Reports: A Precursor to Evaluation Use in Government Organizations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Summative assessment; Formative assessment; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Usability; Business; Treasury; Data collection; Thematic analysis; Program evaluation; Qualitative research; Psychology; Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.378672,0.0007734969,0.0009723425,0.01155325,0.007429758,0.01521679,0.003235369,0.002153258,0.002471323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6073475,0.001104555,0.001167997,0.008925288,0.022948,0.01232168,0.007823947,0.005368027,0.0003845028],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02353619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03640089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04094831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0366824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5384009,0.3303151,0.03332363,0.008872657,0.08317982,0.005907911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1610719,0.5975445,0.052765,0.05146332,0.1334064,0.003748896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003441122,0.0004106837,0.116508,0.004031832,0.0001655636,0.0008532116,0.4581416,0.0006244838,0.002539238,0.08253301,0.01229119,0.321557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001114489,0.001442795,0.3016202,0.01584166,0.0002784,0.002358763,0.3221657,0.003918392,0.009237339,0.04632215,0.2962668,0.0004363291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5372368,0.01070345,0.1920263,0.06089872,0.001264729,0.0060793,0.0007763287,0.0008917969,0.1901226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954291,0.001402486,0.03792422,0.001960341,0.0002427202,0.001605247,0.0001228766,0.0002053226,0.002245763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.378672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7662081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2916528544849001,"score_gpt":0.5123901997387377,"score_spread":0.2207373452538375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}